13,100 instances of "Shouldn't call SchedulePaint in a detached pres context" emitted from layout/generic/nsFrame.cpp during linux64 debug testing
Categories
(Core :: Web Painting, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: erahm, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
25.26 KB,
text/plain
|
Details |
13115 WARNING: Shouldn't call SchedulePaint in a detached pres context: file layout/generic/nsFrame.cpp, line 7090
This warning [1] shows up in the following test suites:
1440 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-no-accel-e10s-3 Ru3
1439 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-no-accel-sw-e10s-3 Ru3
1434 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-e10s-3 R3
1404 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-sw-e10s-3 R3
1231 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-e10s-2 R2
1192 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-no-accel-sw-e10s-2 Ru2
1184 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-sw-e10s-2 R2
1147 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-no-accel-e10s-2 Ru2
205 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-no-accel-sw-e10s-7 Ru7
201 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-sw-e10s-7 R7
199 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-e10s-7 R7
182 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-no-accel-e10s-7 Ru7
182 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-no-accel-e10s-5 Ru5
169 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-sw-e10s-5 R5
167 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-no-accel-sw-e10s-5 Ru5
163 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-e10s-5 R5
146 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-e10s-4 R4
126 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-no-accel-sw-e10s-4 Ru4
126 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-no-accel-e10s-4 Ru4
120 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-sw-e10s-4 R4
118 - test-linux64/debug-crashtest-sw-e10s C
107 - test-linux64/debug-crashtest-e10s C
42 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-e10s-6 R6
42 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-no-accel-e10s-6 Ru6
40 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-no-accel-sw-e10s-6 Ru6
40 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-sw-e10s-6 R6
33 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-sw-e10s-1 R1
30 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-e10s-1 R1
30 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-no-accel-e10s-1 Ru1
30 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-no-accel-sw-e10s-1 Ru1
29 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-sw-e10s-8 R8
28 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-e10s-8 R8
27 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-no-accel-sw-e10s-8 Ru8
25 - test-linux64/debug-reftest-no-accel-e10s-8 Ru8
7 - test-linux64/debug-marionette-e10s Mn
6 - test-linux64/debug-web-platform-tests-reftests-sw-e10s-4 Wr4
6 - test-linux64/debug-web-platform-tests-reftests-e10s-4 Wr4
5 - test-linux64/debug-web-platform-tests-reftests-e10s-3 Wr3
5 - test-linux64/debug-web-platform-tests-reftests-sw-e10s-3 Wr3
2 - test-linux64/debug-mochitest-sw-e10s-13 13
2 - test-linux64/debug-mochitest-e10s-13 13
1 - test-linux64/debug-web-platform-tests-reftests-sw-e10s-1 Wr1
1 - test-linux64/debug-web-platform-tests-wdspec-e10s-1 Wd1
1 - test-linux64/debug-web-platform-tests-wdspec-sw-e10s-2 Wd2
1 - test-linux64/debug-web-platform-tests-reftests-e10s-1 Wr1
It shows up in 330 tests. A few of the most prevalent:
274 - [e10s] file:///builds/worker/workspace/build/tests/reftest/tests/layout/reftests/bidi/numeral/bug467672-2.html == file:///builds/worker/workspace/build/tests/reftest/tests/layout/reftests/bidi/numeral/bug467672-2-ref.html
272 - [e10s] file:///builds/worker/workspace/build/tests/reftest/tests/layout/reftests/bidi/numeral/persian-5.html == file:///builds/worker/workspace/build/tests/reftest/tests/layout/reftests/bidi/numeral/persian-5-ref.html
270 - [e10s] file:///builds/worker/workspace/build/tests/reftest/tests/layout/reftests/bidi/numeral/persian-3.html == file:///builds/worker/workspace/build/tests/reftest/tests/layout/reftests/bidi/numeral/persian-3-ref.html
262 - [e10s] file:///builds/worker/workspace/build/tests/reftest/tests/layout/reftests/bidi/numeral/persian-1.html == file:///builds/worker/workspace/build/tests/reftest/tests/layout/reftests/bidi/numeral/persian-1-ref.html
262 - [e10s] file:///builds/worker/workspace/build/tests/reftest/tests/layout/reftests/bidi/numeral/bug467672-3.html == file:///builds/worker/workspace/build/tests/reftest/tests/layout/reftests/bidi/numeral/bug467672-3-ref.html
261 - [e10s] file:///builds/worker/workspace/build/tests/reftest/tests/layout/reftests/bidi/numeral/bug467672-5.html == file:///builds/worker/workspace/build/tests/reftest/tests/layout/reftests/bidi/numeral/bug467672-5-ref.html
259 - [e10s] file:///builds/worker/workspace/build/tests/reftest/tests/layout/reftests/bidi/numeral/persian-4.html == file:///builds/worker/workspace/build/tests/reftest/tests/layout/reftests/bidi/numeral/persian-4-ref.html
256 - [e10s] file:///builds/worker/workspace/build/tests/reftest/tests/layout/reftests/bidi/numeral/bug467672-4.html == file:///builds/worker/workspace/build/tests/reftest/tests/layout/reftests/bidi/numeral/bug467672-4-ref.html
247 - [e10s] file:///builds/worker/workspace/build/tests/reftest/tests/layout/reftests/bidi/numeral/bug467672-1.html == file:///builds/worker/workspace/build/tests/reftest/tests/layout/reftests/bidi/numeral/bug467672-1-ref.html
244 - [e10s] file:///builds/worker/workspace/build/tests/reftest/tests/layout/reftests/bidi/numeral/persian-2.html == file:///builds/worker/workspace/build/tests/reftest/tests/layout/reftests/bidi/numeral/persian-2-ref.html
Comment 1•5 years ago
|
||
Turning the warning into an assertion and running reftests locally here is the unique stacks I got before I got impatient and killed the reftest run.
Comment 2•5 years ago
|
||
The general pattern is something like "something is still set up from when the document was rendering and not detached".
Specifically
- async callback after prefs change
- image notification
- destroying a frame tree and calling svg rendering observer
- svg font rendering observers called from refresh driver tick
The first 3 could be explained by "prescontext gets detached, but doesn't die until slightly later". For these if I were to write a fix for them it would just be checking if the prescontext is detached in a specific location before calling InvalidateFrame. Seems like just checking InvalidateFrame and returning is better (less code).
For the last one we would hope that we aren't running a refresh driver inside a detached prescontext. Perhaps that should be investigated more.
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 3•5 months ago
|
||
Warning exists, but I don't see any instances in the top 100 on Linux64.
Description
•