Open
Bug 1598748
Opened 5 years ago
Updated 5 years ago
[lando-ui] Include the sec-approval form answers in Phabricator
Categories
(Conduit :: Lando, task, P2)
Conduit
Lando
Tracking
(Not tracked)
NEW
People
(Reporter: mars, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Keywords: conduit-triaged)
Attachments
(1 file)
104.85 KB,
image/png
|
Details |
As a sec-approval team member viewing a sec-approval request in Phabricator I want to be presented with the author's sec-approval Request Form answers in a directly accessible location, such as the Phabricator sec-approval request comment body, so that I can approve the request quickly.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•5 years ago
|
||
From https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Bug_Approval_Process#Requesting_sec-approval
[Security approval request comment]
How easily can the security issue be deduced from the patch?
Do comments in the patch, the check-in comment, or tests included in the patch paint a bulls-eye on the security problem?
Which older supported branches are affected by this flaw?
If not all supported branches, which bug introduced the flaw?
Do you have backports for the affected branches? If not, how different, hard to create, and risky will they be?
How likely is this patch to cause regressions; how much testing does it need?
See the uplift request form implementation for how this could be done.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•5 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → mars
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•5 years ago
|
||
Mockups are here: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/M2
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•