Closed Bug 1605345 Opened 5 years ago Closed 5 years ago

4.76 - 16.93% tsvg_static / tsvgx (linux64-shippable-qr) regression on push d39132658a17709b5eb8da68fa811d95b6b62e93 (Wed December 18 2019)

Categories

(Core :: Graphics: WebRender, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla73
Tracking Status
firefox-esr68 --- unaffected
firefox71 --- unaffected
firefox72 --- unaffected
firefox73 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: alexandrui, Assigned: bpeers)

References

(Regression)

Details

(4 keywords)

Talos has detected a Firefox performance regression from push:

https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/pushloghtml?changeset=d39132658a17709b5eb8da68fa811d95b6b62e93

As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression.

Regressions:

17% tsvgx linux64-shippable-qr opt e10s stylo 252.41 -> 295.16
17% tsvgx linux64-shippable-qr opt e10s stylo 252.45 -> 295.05
5% tsvg_static linux64-shippable-qr opt e10s stylo 46.15 -> 48.34

You can find links to graphs and comparison views for each of the above tests at: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=24563

On the page above you can see an alert for each affected platform as well as a link to a graph showing the history of scores for this test. There is also a link to a treeherder page showing the Talos jobs in a pushlog format.

To learn more about the regressing test(s), please see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/TestEngineering/Performance/Talos

For information on reproducing and debugging the regression, either on try or locally, see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/TestEngineering/Performance/Talos/Running

*** Please let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the offending patch(es) will be backed out! ***

Our wiki page outlines the common responses and expectations: https://wiki.mozilla.org/TestEngineering/Performance/Talos/RegressionBugsHandling

Flags: needinfo?(bpeers)
Component: Performance → Graphics: WebRender
Product: Testing → Core
Version: Version 3 → unspecified

I had already spotted this 2nd bump while keeping an eye on Bug 1604410. The patches have been reverted as part of resolving that regression.
The chart shows things going back to normal.

Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 5 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(bpeers)
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Has Regression Range: --- → yes
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.