Closed Bug 1608011 Opened 4 years ago Closed 4 years ago

Sync telemetry isn't reporting the syncNodeType

Categories

(Firefox :: Sync, defect, P1)

defect

Tracking

()

VERIFIED FIXED
Firefox 74
Tracking Status
firefox72 --- wontfix
firefox73 + verified
firefox74 + verified

People

(Reporter: markh, Assigned: markh)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

Because I neglected to extract it from the tokenserver response :(

[Tracking Requested - why for this release]:

We really want telemetry which indicates what if a user is on the "new" sync storage node.

Priority: -- → P1
Pushed by mhammond@mozilla.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/fe11ab9196ba
ensure sync telemetry reports the storage node type. r=tcsc

Comment on attachment 9119643 [details]
Bug 1608011 - ensure sync telemetry reports the storage node type. r?tcsc

Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request

  • User impact if declined: We're starting the rollout of Durable Sync on Jan 13th; this is one piece that will help us track sync usage. Without it, we have less visibility into sync usage by node type (new storage backend vs old), so run a higher risk of having problems go unnoticed.
  • Is this code covered by automated tests?: Unknown
  • Has the fix been verified in Nightly?: No
  • Needs manual test from QE?: No
  • If yes, steps to reproduce:
  • List of other uplifts needed: None
  • Risk to taking this patch: Low
  • Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): not risky; relates to adding another "allowed" value for sync ping.
  • String changes made/needed:
Attachment #9119643 - Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Flags: qe-verify+

Comment on attachment 9119643 [details]
Bug 1608011 - ensure sync telemetry reports the storage node type. r?tcsc

Looks pretty low-risk. Approved for 73.0b3.

Attachment #9119643 - Flags: approval-mozilla-beta? → approval-mozilla-beta+
Pushed by mhammond@mozilla.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/783350b56e3e
ensure sync telemetry reports the storage node type. r=tcsc
Flags: needinfo?(markh)
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 74
QA Whiteboard: [qa-triaged]

Manual QA attention is confusing here, considering that in Comment 3 is specified that there is no need for manual test from QE and therefore no steps to reproduce are listed, but in Comment 4 the qe-verify flag is marked with “+”.

Could someone clarify this?

QA Whiteboard: [qa-triaged]
Flags: needinfo?(ryanvm)
Flags: needinfo?(rtublitz)

I thought it would be a good idea to verify that the Telemetry pings are containing the expected information now.

Flags: needinfo?(ryanvm)

Good call, :RyanVM. I think we've got what we need now, but let me ni? Leif here just to confirm that.

Flags: needinfo?(rtublitz) → needinfo?(loines)

I can confirm we are getting data in this field now, see this query

Flags: needinfo?(loines)

I followed up with Leif and confirmed that the pings are coming from all the expected channels at this point. I think that's enough to call this verified :)

Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Flags: qe-verify+
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: