Closed
Bug 160886
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
Save As dialog doesn't honor Content-disposition filename extension
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: File Handling, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
DUPLICATE
of bug 120327
People
(Reporter: hgoffin, Assigned: law)
Details
Here is a scenario which describes the problem perfectly: A PHP script is used to generate downloadable files. These files do not match a registered MIME type but should be considered application data (in the cas of my website, they are level maps for Warcraft III). These files have a specific filename extension (.W3M). The PHP script generates the following headers, as well as a Content-Length header and then the datastream: Content-Type: application/x-unknown Content-Disposition: attatchment; filename="(2)Island Hopper.w3m" Problem - the Save As dialog lists the filename as "(2)Island Hopper.w3m.php" and the file type as "PHP File (*.php)". Expected - the Save As dialog lists the filename as "(2)Island Hopper.w3m" and the file type as either "W3M File (*.w3m)" or "Unknown (*.*)" This is affecting a fairly major site, and I cannot find a way to work around it. Please do not tell me that I am using the wrong MIME type, or that I should not be using quotes on the filename, because I have studied the relevant RFCs very carefully. I would prefer to use the octet-stream MIME type, but that causes Mozilla to append a ".exe" suffix, which is far worse than ".php" for me. And please do not close this as a dupe of bug 120327, which is very much related (at some points in its evolution) but not the same. If anything, 120327 is lost and directionless after 300+ comments, and could possibly be marked as a dupe of this.
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
Henry: this IS a dup of 120327. Also, whcih version do you use? (is the patch already in there..?)
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
I think this hits it even better (haven'd read the "Content-disposition") *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 65827 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
This is not exactly a dupe of bug 65827 either, though thanks for pointing me to that one. That bug concerns a *known* MIME content-type, with Mozilla appending what it thinks is the right extension. This bug concerns a unknwon MIME type (for example, application/x-warcraft3map) and Mozilla is automatically appending the .PHP suffix from the script's filename. They have similar consequences but I believe that it is two seperate bugs at work. There is no way that Mozilla could be picking the .PHP suffix that it gives me from the Content-type header.
Status: RESOLVED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
"<michaell> kail: his argument for it not being 65827 is that it is, in fact, a dupe of 120327 :)" *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 120327 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago → 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
mozilla is taking the extension from the file name because you're giving it an unknown MIME type. if you don't want that to happen, the solution is to give it a known MIME type. if there isn't one that's relevant, then you should use application/octet-stream (which would work if bug 120327 was fixed). as I understand it, fixing bug 120327 will result in the "expected" behaviour from your report, rather than the "problem" behaviour, and therefore this is a dupe of it. the behaviour has been improved somewhat with the patch that's in for 120327. are you using a build of mozilla which has that?
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
Yes, I have experienced this with Mozilla 1.0, 1.0.1, 1.1 alpha, 1.1 beta, and a very recent nightly build. Pardon me for being obtuse, but this seems like a bug on its own? We have an unknown MIME type. The content-disposition is providing a file extension. Mozilla ignores the provided extension and tries to guess the MIME type from the name of the script which is generating it. That seems like erroneous behavior to me ... ?
Comment 7•22 years ago
|
||
thinking about this again, I'm not sure this wouldn't be better duped to the other bug after all... the fact that mozilla ignores the content-disposition and always uses the code which looks at MIME type (or guesses when it doesn't know) is bug 65827. the fact that you can't fix it by changing the MIME type is bug 120327. what you are describing are slightly different symptoms, but the bugs are those which are already filed. and it is most certainly erroneous behaviour - we're not saying your report isn't valid, just that it is covered by existing bugs.
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
Thank you for the explaination :) I can see a lot of (perhaps entirely too much) internal discussion about 120327, and while several different fixes have been proposed, nothing substantial has been done. I wonder if it would be worth my time to read up on Moz's internals and submit a patch... Anyway, I've worked around these bug now that I can see it won't be fixed for months, if not years. I'm not happy with it, but generating a temporary unique URL for the content and then redirecting the browser by META refresh seems to work. Sigh.
Comment 9•22 years ago
|
||
Henry, this should in fact get fixed when I fix bug 65827.... And it'll hopefully take less than months (and definitely less than years).
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Updated•8 years ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•