Closed Bug 1619883 Opened 5 years ago Closed 5 years ago

Don't include spellchecker dictionary in omni.ja of GeckoView

Categories

(GeckoView :: General, enhancement, P1)

Unspecified
Android
enhancement

Tracking

(firefox76 fixed)

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla76
Tracking Status
firefox76 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: m_kato, Assigned: m_kato)

Details

(Whiteboard: [geckoview:m76])

Attachments

(1 file)

Actually, we don't turn on hunspell spellchecker for Android, but, omni.ja seems have hunspell's dictionary.

makoto$ unzip -vl omni.ja  | grep -i en-US
    3074  Defl:X      970  68% 01-01-2010 00:00 efab1c90  dictionaries/en-US.aff
  586387  Defl:X   201822  66% 01-01-2010 00:00 ec359f3f  dictionaries/en-US.dic

Actually, we don't turn on hunspell spellchecker for Android, but, omni.ja seems have hunspell's dictionary. Let's remove it from package.

Assignee: nobody → m_kato
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Priority: -- → P1
Whiteboard: [geckoview:m76]
Pushed by m_kato@ga2.so-net.ne.jp: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/6c28df02dc2b Don't include spellchecker dictionary in omni.ja of GeckoView. r=geckoview-reviewers,agi
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 5 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla76

We do still build spellchecker and hunspell for Android though, right? At least I see the relevant .o files in android objdir.
Do you think we could avoid building those?

Flags: needinfo?(m_kato)

(In reply to Olli Pettay [:smaug][bugs@pettay.fi] from comment #4)

We do still build spellchecker and hunspell for Android though, right? At least I see the relevant .o files in android objdir.
Do you think we could avoid building those?

Right. Since hunspell is a XPCOM service as mozISpellCheckingEngine, we can avoid to build it on GeckoView.

Flags: needinfo?(m_kato)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: