Open Bug 1620388 Opened 5 years ago Updated 2 years ago

Convert the thread 'NamedPipeSrv' to use the background thread pool

Categories

(Core :: Networking, task, P3)

task

Tracking

()

People

(Reporter: KrisWright, Unassigned)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

(Whiteboard: [necko-triaged])

The thread NamedPipeSrv [1] uses the NS_NewNamedThread method, so it might be possible to move it to the background thread pool.

In an effort to reduce the number of ad-hoc threads in the browser, we want to convert instances of NS_NewNamedThread to use the background thread pool [2] wherever possible. If your thread may block, you can also include the NS_DISPATCH_EVENT_MAY_BLOCK flag.

[1] https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/c79c0d65a183d9d38676855f455a5c6a7f7dadd3/netwerk/socket/nsNamedPipeService.cpp#71
[2] https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/91f6c02fcf4c16f78fdc4417f61f192688294066/xpcom/threads/nsThreadUtils.h#1730-1757

Priority: -- → P3
Whiteboard: [necko-triaged]

(In reply to Kris Wright :KrisWright from comment #0)

The thread NamedPipeSrv [1] uses the NS_NewNamedThread method, so it might be possible to move it to the background thread pool.

In an effort to reduce the number of ad-hoc threads in the browser, we want to convert instances of NS_NewNamedThread to use the background thread pool [2] wherever possible. If your thread may block, you can also include the NS_DISPATCH_EVENT_MAY_BLOCK flag.

[1] https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/c79c0d65a183d9d38676855f455a5c6a7f7dadd3/netwerk/socket/nsNamedPipeService.cpp#71
[2] https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/91f6c02fcf4c16f78fdc4417f61f192688294066/xpcom/threads/nsThreadUtils.h#1730-1757

Hey Kris!

I was working on this where I noticed that we have used nsIObservers and functions related to it. I think they can be handled by the background thread but just wanted to check if I should keep them or not?

Thanks!

Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.