Closed Bug 1625458 Opened 5 years ago Closed 5 years ago

Add &nnbsp; entity for U+202F

Categories

(Core :: DOM: HTML Parser, enhancement)

74 Branch
enhancement
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED INVALID

People

(Reporter: ygoe, Unassigned)

Details

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:74.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/74.0

Steps to reproduce:

This is a feature request or more an idea of an extension to the HTML standard. I've already opened the issue here:
https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/5121

Not sure if this bug tracker is a good place to ask for this. But the other issue is labelled as "needs implementer interest" so I thought it might help to make those implementers aware of the issue.

Should I repeat the complete issue text here as well? Please advise.

Bugbug thinks this bug should belong to this component, but please revert this change in case of error.

Product: Firefox → WebExtensions
Component: Untriaged → DOM: HTML Parser
Product: WebExtensions → Core

We don't use Bugzilla for non-standard features generally. We'd probably pick this up if other browsers did it and went through the trouble of writing tests and such, but I'm not convinced it's worth the effort.

Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 5 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID

Just to be sure I understand this correctly, changes to the HTML standard will only be made when browsers show interest, but Mozilla doesn't want to be the one that shows this interest? I'll also ask the Chrome people but then I have no more options for innovation since there are no other browsers.

I clearly have no idea of what it takes to implement this; I'd have thought it's a few list entries here and there and a few test cases for them to add a new and currently undefined HTML entity. Since it's only about converting HTML into Unicode, and that Unicode character can already be written directly, it shouldn't have too many consequences.

Don't get me wrong, I'm by no means requesting any certain time schedule. But this addition would be very helpful in the end to achieve good-looking (and typographically correct – for other languages than English) results with yet unachieved maintainability.

You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.