Closed
Bug 163024
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
bugzilla_email_append.pl calls processmail incorrectly
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Bugzilla-General, defect, P1)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 2.18
People
(Reporter: bbaetz, Assigned: bbaetz)
Details
(Whiteboard: [fixed in 2.16.1] [fixed in 2.14.4] [fixed on trunk])
Attachments
(1 file)
696 bytes,
patch
|
bugreport
:
review+
preed
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
Bleh. Stupid enter key... Anyway, as jussi pointed out in bug 160631, bugzilla_email_append.pl uses the same quoting that bug_email.pl used, which was fixed for bug 154008: system("cd .. ; ./processmail $found_id '$SenderShort'"); is not the way to go. We should fix that....
Severity: normal → critical
Priority: -- → P1
Whiteboard: [want for 2.16.1]
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.18
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
This patch WFM. (modulo the usual bug_email bugs)
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
What happened to "cd .."? Gerv
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
Its not needed since bug 154008 went in - ie this is another breakage from that.
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 95666 [details] [diff] [review] patch r=joel assuming that someone has confirmed that the routined still does its desired function. Still need a seperate 2xr for 2.16 branch.
Attachment #95666 -
Flags: review+
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 95666 [details] [diff] [review] patch People still use this stuff?! Wild. r2=preed
Attachment #95666 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•22 years ago
|
||
Yes, people still use this (unfortunately) Checked in to trunk and 2.16/2.14 branches
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [want for 2.16.1] → [fixed in 2.16.1] [fixed in 2.14.4] [fixed on trunk]
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
Removing security bit for publication in status report.
Group: webtools-security?
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•22 years ago
|
||
Err... Weren't we waiting for 2.16.1 before removing the sceuirity bit? Readding the security bit for now....
Group: webtools-security?
Comment 10•22 years ago
|
||
Security Announcement is posted. removing the security bit.
Group: webtools-security?
Updated•11 years ago
|
QA Contact: matty_is_a_geek → default-qa
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•