1632626 - [meta] Add GeckoView support for WebExtensions

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(GeckoView :: Extensions, enhancement, P3)

Description

[pedigololok]

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1468844 +++

I'm filing this meta bug because the topic of GeckoView support for WebExtensions comes up often, but we don't know if or when we will support them in GeckoView and/or Fenix.

Comment 1

[[ex-Mozilla] Agi Sferro | :agi]

Hi pedigololok! Could you clarify what the intent of this bug is? We already support many WebExtension APIs and we are going to support all of the ones that make sense on mobile (see other bugs in this component).

Comment 2

[pedigololok]

Hello, I apologize for the late response. I have had someone in each and every single phone, for over a year, they steal every single penny, make things so hard for me, I was trying to do anything I could in order to find someone to help me. I have encryptions, they are sent to me, I have lots of data, I just need help figuring out who and why and how to protect myself, things are getting bad. 317-7603113, I won't answer calls I don't know, my number changes,
But here is one you can always find me near 3174140491. I just need help

Comment 3

[BugBot [:suhaib / :marco/ :calixte]]

The meta keyword is there, the bug doesn't depend on other bugs and there is no activity for 12 months.
:fluffyemily, maybe it's time to close this bug?

Comment 4

[BugBot [:suhaib / :marco/ :calixte]]

Clear needinfos that are pending on inactive users.

Inactive users most likely will not respond; if the missing information is essential and cannot be collected another way, the bug maybe should be closed as INCOMPLETE.

For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.

Comment 5

[Chris Peterson [:cpeterson]]

Tasks and enhancements should have severity N/A.

Comment 6

[BugBot [:suhaib / :marco/ :calixte]]

The meta keyword is there, the bug doesn't depend on other bugs and there is no activity for 12 months.
:amejia, maybe it's time to close this bug?