New wpt failures in /css/css-animations/animation-important-001.html
Categories
(Core :: CSS Transitions and Animations, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: wpt-sync, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [wpt])
Syncing wpt PR 23032 found new untriaged test failures in CI
Tests Affected
New Tests That Don't Pass
/css/css-animations/animation-important-001.html: ERROR (Chrome: OK, Safari: ERROR)
CI Results
Gecko CI (Treeherder)
GitHub PR Head
Notes
These updates will be on mozilla-central once bug 1630745 lands.
Note: this bug is for tracking fixing the issues and is not
owned by the wpt sync bot.
This bug is linked to the relevant tests by an annotation in
https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt-metadata. These annotations
can be edited using the wpt interop dashboard
https://jgraham.github.io/wptdash/
If this bug is split into multiple bugs, please also update the
annotations, otherwise we are unable to track which wpt issues are
already triaged. Resolving as duplicate or closing this issue should
be cause the bot to automatically update or remove the annotation.
|
||
Comment 1•5 years ago
|
||
The priority flag is not set for this bug.
:svoisen, could you have a look please?
For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.
|
||
Comment 2•5 years ago
|
||
This is failing because we don't support CSS.registerProperty. Marking as a dupe of bug 1273706.
(It would be neat if we could easily annotate WPT failures with bug numbers without having to clone m-c.)
|
||
Comment 3•5 years ago
|
||
It would be neat if we could easily annotate WPT failures with bug numbers without having to clone m-c.
We are trying to use that external metadata more rather than the in-tree ones, although I ought to manually copy over the in-tree ones again at some point.
|
|
||
Comment 4•5 years ago
|
||
(In reply to James Graham [:jgraham] from comment #3)
It would be neat if we could easily annotate WPT failures with bug numbers without having to clone m-c.
We are trying to use that external metadata more rather than the in-tree ones, although I ought to manually copy over the in-tree ones again at some point.
Oh, I didn't know that!
I just tried the tool now and generated: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt-metadata/pull/218
|
|
||
Comment 5•5 years ago
|
||
Yeah, it's been mentioned a few times (and is in the summary comment in these auto-filed bugs), but I don't think anyone really uses it / knows it's there yet.
Looks like I'm using that metadata endpoint in the wrong way since one of the test labels got duplicated in the PR. I'll investigate that. Thanks for using it and feedback is always welcome (of course).
|
|
||
Comment 6•5 years ago
|
||
(In reply to James Graham [:jgraham] from comment #5)
Yeah, it's been mentioned a few times (and is in the summary comment in these auto-filed bugs), but I don't think anyone really uses it / knows it's there yet.
Sorry about that. I see that now!
Looks like I'm using that metadata endpoint in the wrong way since one of the test labels got duplicated in the PR. I'll investigate that. Thanks for using it and feedback is always welcome (of course).
Thank you!
Description
•