Closed Bug 1641534 Opened 4 years ago Closed 2 years ago

2% raptor-tp6-yahoo-mail-firefox-cold fcp (linux64-shippable-qr) regression on push 3afdf3a5bec4902b80f5e67d93ca9f7f9f12edbd (May 22 2020)

Categories

(Core :: Graphics: WebRender, defect, P3)

defect

Tracking

()

RESOLVED WONTFIX
Tracking Status
firefox-esr68 --- unaffected
firefox76 --- unaffected
firefox77 --- unaffected
firefox78 --- wontfix

People

(Reporter: Bebe, Unassigned)

References

(Regression)

Details

(Keywords: perf, perf-alert, regression)

Perfherder has detected a raptor performance regression from push 3afdf3a5bec4902b80f5e67d93ca9f7f9f12edbd. As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression.

Regressions:
2% raptor-tp6-yahoo-mail-firefox-cold fcp linux64-shippable-qr opt 324.79 -> 332.75
2% raptor-tp6-yahoo-mail-firefox-cold fcp linux64-shippable-qr opt 325.00 -> 332.92

For up to date results, see: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=26085

Details of the alert can be found in the alert summary, including links to graphs and comparisons for each of the affected tests. Please follow our guide to handling regression bugs and let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the offending patch(es) will be backed out in accordance with our regression policy.

For more information on performance sheriffing please see our FAQ.

Component: Performance → Graphics: WebRender
Flags: needinfo?(gwatson)
Product: Testing → Core

Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1637953

Blocks: wr-perf
Severity: -- → S3
Has Regression Range: --- → yes
Priority: -- → P3

The regressions mentioned in the comment, and the linked perf alert match up with the same issue we saw in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1640101#c5 (in which case we can close this).

However, they don't appear to correlate at all with the title of the bug? Is the bug title incorrect, or am I misunderstanding?

Flags: needinfo?(gwatson)

However, they don't appear to correlate at all with the title of the bug? Is the bug title incorrect, or am I misunderstanding?

The bug description was edited and the title no longer matches.

(In reply to Glenn Watson [:gw] from comment #2)

The regressions mentioned in the comment, and the linked perf alert match up with the same issue we saw in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1640101#c5 (in which case we can close this).

However, they don't appear to correlate at all with the title of the bug? Is the bug title incorrect, or am I misunderstanding?

Flags: needinfo?(dave.hunt)
Flags: needinfo?(dave.hunt) → needinfo?(fstrugariu)

This is my mistake sorry for the wrong bug title.
Updated

Flags: needinfo?(fstrugariu)
Summary: 123.48% raptor-tp6m-booking-geckoview-cold loadtime (android-hw-p2-8-0-android-aarch64-shippable) regression on push 71a05993c9bd5ff8c2e6e264096b73098033147c (Wed May 27 2020) → 2% raptor-tp6-yahoo-mail-firefox-cold fcp (linux64-shippable-qr) regression on push 3afdf3a5bec4902b80f5e67d93ca9f7f9f12edbd (May 22 2020)
No longer blocks: wr-perf
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 2 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.