Open Bug 1642306 Opened 6 years ago Updated 6 years ago

Tidy filter.py following switch to JSON for search

Categories

(SeaMonkey :: Build Config, task)

Tracking

(Not tracked)

ASSIGNED

People

(Reporter: iannbugzilla, Assigned: iannbugzilla)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

Following the landing of Bug 1300198, l10n.toml and filter.py probably need tidying up.

Attached patch Tidy up — — Splinter Review

Requesting feedback as want to make sure this won't break anything for pontoon, cross-repo, etc.

Attachment #9153122 - Flags: feedback?(francesco.lodolo)

I wanted to redirect this to Pike, but I have no way to do it in Bugzilla…

filter.py looks good to me, I think you should keep the l10n.toml as is for now, and file a follow-up bug to remove it once we stop tracking all trees that include the old search system.

Comment on attachment 9153122 [details] [diff] [review] Tidy up Redirecting to Pike
Attachment #9153122 - Flags: feedback?(francesco.lodolo) → feedback?(l10n)
Comment on attachment 9153122 [details] [diff] [review] Tidy up Review of attachment 9153122 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Yeah, l10n.toml controls cross-channel, we need to hold those changes until they're out of shipping. Also, this patch is a good example of why we don't merge l10n.toml, aside from toml being hard. The removal of an ignore is a double negative, and that's culturally hard ;-) Aka, I haven't burnt a brain or two on figuring that out.
Attachment #9153122 - Flags: feedback?(l10n) → feedback-
Summary: Tidy l10n.toml and filter.py following switch to JSON for search → Tidy filter.py following switch to JSON for search
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: