Cannot find autoconf 2.13
Categories
(Firefox Build System :: General, defect)
Tracking
(firefox-esr68 unaffected, firefox-esr78 unaffected, firefox79 unaffected, firefox80 wontfix, firefox81 fixed)
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr68 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox-esr78 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox79 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox80 | --- | wontfix |
| firefox81 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: daleharvey, Assigned: rstewart)
References
(Regression)
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(1 file)
Had this reported to me, after a successful ./mach bootstrap on a fresh ubuntu install the build failed with "Cannot find autoconf 2.13" - https://pastebin.com/7kH2dugR for the full log
I tried to reproduce and ran into the same error, sudo apt install autoconf2.13 let the build resume
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•5 years ago
|
||
Sorry, what's the bug here? Sounds like you needed to install autoconf2.13 which is a build requirement, and then when you installed it everything worked fine? This sounds like everything is working as intended to me.
Comment 2•5 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ricky Stewart from comment #1)
Sorry, what's the bug here? Sounds like you needed to install
autoconf2.13which is a build requirement, and then when you installed it everything worked fine? This sounds like everything is working as intended to me.
I think the bug is that mach bootstrap didn't actually install autoconf2.13 like it was supposed to?
https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/python/mozboot/mozboot/debian.py#32-35
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•5 years ago
|
||
There we go, thanks for the pointer, that makes perfect sense. Maybe I should stop triaging first thing Monday morning. :)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•5 years ago
|
||
This got trampled in an overzealous code deletion in bug 1647814.
Updated•5 years ago
|
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 6•5 years ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
Comment 7•5 years ago
|
||
Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1647814
Comment 8•5 years ago
|
||
The patch landed in nightly and beta is affected.
:rstewart, is this bug important enough to require an uplift?
If not please set status_beta to wontfix.
For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.
Updated•5 years ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 9•5 years ago
|
||
This is a bootstrap change, so we don't need to uplift.
Description
•