Closed Bug 1656686 Opened 4 years ago Closed 4 years ago

Perma TEST-UNEXPECTED-PASS | /html/semantics/embedded-content/the-img-element/image-loading-subpixel-clip.html | Testing http://web-platform.test:8000/html/semantics/embedded-content/the-img-element/image-loading-subpixel-clip.html

Categories

(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect, P5)

defect

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
81 Branch
Tracking Status
firefox-esr68 --- unaffected
firefox-esr78 --- unaffected
firefox79 --- unaffected
firefox80 --- fixed
firefox81 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: intermittent-bug-filer, Assigned: apavel)

References

(Regression)

Details

(Keywords: intermittent-failure, regression)

Attachments

(1 file)

Flags: needinfo?(jmaher)
Assignee: nobody → apavel
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Flags: needinfo?(jmaher)

Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1656228

Attachment #9167577 - Attachment description: Bug 1656686 - update image-loading-subpixel-clip.html expectancy for android r?#intermittent-reviewers → Bug 1656686 - update image-loading-subpixel-clip.html expectancy for android r?#intermittent-reviewers DONTBUILD
Pushed by ccoroiu@mozilla.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/fcba8672cc31
update image-loading-subpixel-clip.html expectancy for android r=jmaher DONTBUILD

Ryan this shows up on beta and got filed as Bug 1657723, can the patch here be uplifted?

Flags: needinfo?(ryanvm)
Flags: needinfo?(ryanvm)

Hi Andrea, can we close this then?

Flags: needinfo?(apavel)

(In reply to Jens Stutte [:jstutte] (REO for FF 81) from comment #10)

Hi Andrea, can we close this then?

Hi. We keep open bugs in which tests got disabled or bugs in which test expectation got modified to keep track of them for future reference.

Flags: needinfo?(apavel)
Severity: normal → S4

This was updating a test's expectations to allow it to pass, though. Are we expecting some sort of follow-up here still? I could see it for disabling a test or something, but it's not clear to me that there's anything left to actually do here.

Flags: needinfo?(apavel)

(In reply to Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM] from comment #12)

This was updating a test's expectations to allow it to pass, though. Are we expecting some sort of follow-up here still? I could see it for disabling a test or something, but it's not clear to me that there's anything left to actually do here.

Uhm, I'm not sure. Aryx in this case do we leave open? (afaik we left them open in the past)

Flags: needinfo?(apavel) → needinfo?(aryx.bugmail)

Yes. Bug created for test passing unexpectedly && expectation update after that => case closed.

Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(aryx.bugmail)
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → 81 Branch
Has Regression Range: --- → yes
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: