LUL: reduce space consumption by not storing duplicate RuleSets
Categories
(Core :: Gecko Profiler, enhancement, P2)
Tracking
()
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox82 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: jseward, Assigned: jseward)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
LUL (a Lightweight Unwind Library) performs unwinding on targets that use
Dwarf CFI metadata. As each Linux/Android shared object is mapped into
memory, it reads unwind data from the objects .eh_frame and/or .debug_frame
sections, and from that info produces a set of canned how-to-unwind recipes,
called RuleSets, which are stored in a SecMap object. There is one SecMap
object for each mapped object in the process.
Each RuleSet describes how to do a step of unwinding for some code address
range. Most code address ranges are very short (a few bytes) and so there are
many RuleSets. libxul.so as of Sept 2020 has approaching 4 million RuleSets,
for example. Currently, each is 48 bytes long, and so storing them all
requires considerable space, over 200MB.
This patch reduces the storage requirement almost by a factor of 6. The key
observation is that although there are many RuleSets, almost all of them are
duplicates. libxul.so typically has less than 300 different RuleSets. This
patch exploits that observation using two different compression schemes.
Firstly, it makes sense to store each different RuleSet only once, in a vector
("the dictionary"). Then, instead of storing (for libxul.so) a vector of 4
million 48-byte-sized RuleSets, we store a vector of 4 million triples, of the
form
(code_address, len, dictionary_index)
If code_address is 64-bit, and we (entirely reasonably) constrain len and
dictionary_index to be 32 bits, then a triple takes 16 bytes. This would
give a factor of 3 memory saving, assuming (again reasonably) that the
dictionary's size is insignificant.
Secondly, we observe that (a) all code_addresses for any specific shared
object (hence, for the associated RuleSet) span at maximum about 120MB, (b)
that the highest observed dictionary_index is less than 400, and (c) that
almost all len values are less than 2^16. Hence we can represent that
triple as
(32-bit offset_from_RuleSet_base_address, 16-bit len, 16-bit dictionary_index)
For the few len values that won't fit into 16 bits, we can chop the range up
into a sequence of 2^16-1 long chunks. This is exceedingly rare in practice.
With this arrangement, each triple is 8 bytes, hence giving the final
compression figure of 6 == 48 / 8.
In the patch, the triple is represented by a new struct, Extent.
This scheme is described (more or less) in
https://blog.mozilla.org/jseward/2013/09/03/how-compactly-can-cfiexidx-stack-unwinding-info-be-represented/
and there is background information on the representations at
https://blog.mozilla.org/jseward/2013/08/29/how-fast-can-cfiexidx-based-stack-unwinding-be/
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
LUL (a Lightweight Unwind Library) performs unwinding on targets that use
Dwarf CFI metadata. As each Linux/Android shared object is mapped into
memory, it reads unwind data from the objects .eh_frame and/or .debug_frame
sections, and from that info produces a set of canned how-to-unwind recipes,
called RuleSets, which are stored in a SecMap object. There is one SecMap
object for each mapped object in the process.
Each RuleSet describes how to do a step of unwinding for some code address
range. Most code address ranges are very short (a few bytes) and so there are
many RuleSets. libxul.so as of Sept 2020 has approaching 4 million RuleSets,
for example. Currently, each is 48 bytes long, and so storing them all
requires considerable space, over 200MB.
This patch reduces the storage requirement almost by a factor of 6. The key
observation is that although there are many RuleSets, almost all of them are
duplicates. libxul.so typically has less than 300 different RuleSets. This
patch exploits that observation using two different compression schemes.
Firstly, it makes sense to store each different RuleSet only once, in a vector
("the dictionary"). Then, instead of storing (for libxul.so) a vector of 4
million 48-byte-sized RuleSets, we store a vector of 4 million triples, of the
form
(code_address, len, dictionary_index)
If code_address is 64-bit, and we (entirely reasonably) constrain len and
dictionary_index to be 32 bits, then a triple takes 16 bytes. This would
give a factor of 3 memory saving, assuming (again reasonably) that the
dictionary's size is insignificant.
Secondly, we observe that (a) all code_addresses for any specific shared
object (hence, for the associated RuleSet) span at maximum about 120MB, (b)
that the highest observed dictionary_index is less than 400, and (c) that
almost all len values are less than 2^16. Hence we can represent that
triple as
(32-bit offset_from_RuleSet_base_address, 16-bit len, 16-bit dictionary_index)
For the few len values that won't fit into 16 bits, we can chop the range up
into a sequence of 2^16-1 long chunks. This is exceedingly rare in practice.
With this arrangement, each triple is 8 bytes, hence giving the final
compression figure of 6 == 48 / 8.
In the patch, the triple is represented by a new struct, Extent.
This scheme is described (more or less) in
https://blog.mozilla.org/jseward/2013/09/03/how-compactly-can-cfiexidx-stack-unwinding-info-be-represented/
and there is background information on the representations at
https://blog.mozilla.org/jseward/2013/08/29/how-fast-can-cfiexidx-based-stack-unwinding-be/
Specific changes are:
class RuleSet: fields mAddr and mLen, which used to specify the address
range to which the RuleSet applied, have been removed. They can no longer be
part of RuleSet because each RuleSet is now stored only once, and referenced
by each address range fragment which uses it. The address information has
instead been moved to ..
struct Extent: this is a new, 8 byte structure, which specifies address
ranges, and indices into the dictionary of RuleSets, as described above.
class SecMap: this holds all the unwind information harvested from a single
Linux/Android shared object.
-
Per the description above, the may-contain-duplicates vector of RuleSets,
mRuleSet, has been removed. Instead it is replaced by a vector of
Extents,mExtents, and the duplicate-free vector of RuleSets,
mDictionary, entries in which are referred to frommExtents. -
mDictionarycannot be efficiently created until we know all the RuleSets
that it will need to contain. Hence, while reading unwind data, a hash
table,mUniqifier, is used as an intermediate. This maps RuleSets to
unique integer IDs. Once reading is complete,mUniqifieris enumerated in
order of the unique IDs, and the RuleSets are copied into their correct
locations inmDictionary.mUniqifieris then deleted, and plays no
further role.
In terms of actions, the main changes are:
-
SecMap::AddRuleSet: the new RuleSet is looked up in
mUniqifier, or added
if missing. This generates a dictionary-index for it. This is the core of
the de-duplication process. Also, a newmExtententry is added for the
range. -
SecMap::PrepareRuleSets: this is called once all info has been read, but
before we commence unwinding. ThemExtents implied-address-ranges are
sorted, trimmed and generally tidied up.mDictionaryis created from
mUniqifierand the latter is deleted.
Secondary changes:
-
SecMap::mSummaryMinAddr and SecMap::mSummaryMaxAddr have been removed and
replaced bymMapMinAVMAandmMapMaxAVMA.mSummaryMinAddrandmSummaryMaxAddrpreviously held the minimum and
maximum code addresses of any RuleSets in this SecMap. However, computing
them incrementally is no longer possible, and in any case we need to have a
fixed address for the SecMap against which the Extent::offset fields are
based.Hence we store instead the lowest and highest code addresses for the mapped
text segment that this SecMap covers -- hencemMapMinAVMAand
mMapMaxAVMA. These are known before we start reading unwind info for this
SecMap, and are guaranteed to be a superset of the range previously
specified bymSummaryMinAddrandmSummaryMaxAddr. These ranges are
guaranteed not to overlap the ranges of any other SecMap in the system, and
hence can still be used for their intended purpose of binary-searching to
top level collection of SecMaps (which is owned by the one-and-only PriMap). -
Some comments have been cleaned up. Some imprecise uses of the term
"address" have been replaced with the more precise terminology "AVMA"
(Actual Virtual Memory Address). See existing comment at the top of
LulMain.h.
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
Description
•