Closed
Bug 1665979
Opened 5 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
Crash in [@ nsTHashtable<T>::s_HashKey | PLDHashTable::Search | nsHostResolver::AddToEvictionQ]
Categories
(Core :: Networking: DNS, defect, P1)
Core
Networking: DNS
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
83 Branch
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox-esr68 | --- | unaffected |
firefox-esr78 | --- | unaffected |
firefox80 | --- | unaffected |
firefox81 | --- | unaffected |
firefox82 | --- | fixed |
firefox83 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: aryx, Assigned: valentin)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug, Regression)
Details
(Keywords: crash, regression, Whiteboard: [necko-triaged][trr])
Crash Data
Attachments
(1 file)
Bug 1665979 - Make sure we call MaybeRenewHostRecord when adding additional record r=dragana,kershaw
47 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
jcristau
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Review |
This call passes through SaveAdditionalRecords
which got added in bug 1645108 on Tuesday.
Crash report: https://crash-stats.mozilla.org/report/index/0fdd9fe4-ac6d-434e-873f-ff9dd0200917
Top 10 frames of crashing thread:
0 xul.dll static nsTHashtable<nsBaseHashtableET<nsGenericHashKey<nsHostKey>, RefPtr<nsHostRecord> > >::s_HashKey xpcom/ds/nsTHashtable.h:487
1 xul.dll PLDHashTable::Search const xpcom/ds/PLDHashTable.cpp:496
2 xul.dll nsHostResolver::AddToEvictionQ netwerk/dns/nsHostResolver.cpp:1875
3 xul.dll nsHostResolver::CompleteLookup netwerk/dns/nsHostResolver.cpp:2135
4 xul.dll mozilla::net::TRR::SaveAdditionalRecords netwerk/dns/TRR.cpp:1372
5 xul.dll mozilla::net::TRR::DohDecode netwerk/dns/TRR.cpp:1310
6 xul.dll mozilla::net::TRR::FollowCname netwerk/dns/TRR.cpp:1621
7 xul.dll mozilla::net::TRR::OnStopRequest netwerk/dns/TRR.cpp:1734
8 xul.dll mozilla::net::TRRServiceChannel::OnStopRequest netwerk/protocol/http/TRRServiceChannel.cpp:1210
9 xul.dll nsInputStreamPump::OnStateStop netwerk/base/nsInputStreamPump.cpp:649
Flags: needinfo?(valentin.gosu)
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•5 years ago
|
||
If we don't, the record may already be on the eviction queue, meaning
we try to remove it twice.
Updated•5 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → valentin.gosu
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Blocks: doh
Severity: -- → S2
Component: Networking → Networking: DNS
Flags: needinfo?(valentin.gosu)
Priority: -- → P1
Whiteboard: [necko-triaged][trr]
Pushed by valentin.gosu@gmail.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/19330c144141
Make sure we call MaybeRenewHostRecord when adding additional record r=kershaw,necko-reviewers
Comment 3•5 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 5 years ago
status-firefox83:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → 83 Branch
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•5 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9176732 [details]
Bug 1665979 - Make sure we call MaybeRenewHostRecord when adding additional record r=dragana,kershaw
Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request
- User impact if declined: Potential crashes when using DNS over HTTPS
- Is this code covered by automated tests?: Yes
- Has the fix been verified in Nightly?: Yes
- Needs manual test from QE?: No
- If yes, steps to reproduce:
- List of other uplifts needed: None
- Risk to taking this patch: Low
- Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky):
- String changes made/needed:
Attachment #9176732 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Comment 5•5 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9176732 [details]
Bug 1665979 - Make sure we call MaybeRenewHostRecord when adding additional record r=dragana,kershaw
approved for 82.0b2
Attachment #9176732 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta? → approval-mozilla-beta+
Comment 6•5 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
Updated•4 years ago
|
Keywords: regression
Updated•4 years ago
|
Has Regression Range: --- → yes
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•