Fenix loads cloudflare.com 5 seconds slower than Chrome
Categories
(Core :: Performance, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: yoasif, Unassigned)
References
(Depends on 1 open bug)
Details
(Keywords: perf:pageload)
Basic information
Saw a video shared on social media with a test between Brave and Fenix: https://vimeo.com/461247541
Recreated the test with Chrome vs. Fenix on a Moto G XT1031 with Warp enabled.
cloudflare.com
chrome - 3.5 seconds
firefox - 8.6 seconds
More information
Profile URL: https://share.firefox.dev/33S7s7m
Basic systems configuration:
OS version: Android 5.1
GPU model: Adreno 305
Number of cores: Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7
Amount of memory (RAM): 1GB
Thanks so much for your help.
Reporter | ||
Updated•4 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•4 years ago
|
Comment 1•4 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Asif Youssuff from comment #0)
chrome - 3.5 seconds
firefox - 8.6 seconds
How reliable is this performance difference for you? (Is Chrome always this good, and is Firefox always this bad?)
(dthayer and I both tried this locally, and we're seeing 1-3 second load times from both Firefox and Chrome.)
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•4 years ago
|
||
Daniel, there is some weirdness with this page - sometimes Fenix is better than the worst case, and Chrome is worse than its best case. I also noticed that Chrome seems to be employing tricks - their progress bar disappears, but if I immediately tap the main menu, I see that the refresh button has not yet become a refresh button - it is still a X (stop) symbol.
Perhaps this is a UI trick - but even if so, it makes Fenix look slow even if there is nothing happening on screen. My measurements were done based on the browser progress bar, not based on content appearing or not moving around on screen. Given that mobiles are small screened devices, I really have no idea of what is happening after the first screen, so I am relying on the progress bar to give me status on whether the page has finished loading.
Would you like HAR exports from both browsers, or does the above give you any sort of hint? I also tried a LG Optimus G - faster device, 5Ghz WiFi (N) which shows the same variance (with Fenix being "slower"). My Pixel 2 basically shows no difference between the two.
Comment 3•4 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Asif Youssuff from comment #2)
I also noticed that Chrome seems to be employing tricks - their progress bar disappears, but if I immediately tap the main menu, I see that the refresh button has not yet become a refresh button - it is still a X (stop) symbol.
This is some known shenanigans & is tracked in bug 1454477.
Would you like HAR exports from both browsers, or does the above give you any sort of hint?
Thank you for offering! I think "no" (though maybe someone on the performance team will disagree & ask for that).
Given the variance (Firefox sometimes fast, Chrome sometimes slow), and the fact that the progress-bar comparison isn't entirely apples-to-apples here due to bug 1454477, I'm going to triage this as qf:p3 (our bucket for most bugs), and as a dependency of bug 1454477 for now.
I don't think it makes sense for anyone to dive in here too much until we've decided what we want to do about bug 1454477.
Updated•4 years ago
|
Updated•3 years ago
|
Updated•3 years ago
|
Description
•