Add words to en-US dictionary
Categories
(Core :: Spelling checker, task)
Tracking
()
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox84 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: ananuti, Assigned: ananuti)
References
Details
Attachments
(3 files, 1 obsolete file)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•5 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•5 years ago
|
||
^
^
from bug 499593 comment 352 - 408.
I'll do the rest of it later.
Comment 3•5 years ago
|
||
Comment 4•5 years ago
|
||
Excellent, thanks.
I pushed it to phabricator on your behalf.
I think we could land this one now, don't you think?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•5 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Sylvestre Ledru [:Sylvestre] from comment #4)
Excellent, thanks.
I pushed it to phabricator on your behalf.I think we could land this one now, don't you think?
Testing failed with the word "subpoenable". I'll fix that in full patch, tomorrow maybe. :)
Comment 6•5 years ago
•
|
||
Sounds good! I really don't mind uploading/reviewing the patches for you!
Btw, how do you run tests for this? (I don't know :)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•5 years ago
|
||
Just mv en-US.dic en-US.aff (optional) into firefox dictionaries folder (I do this with Firefox 62 because not yet bundled to om.ja (bug 1457321). easier for me to hack) and test it by hand.
Pasting all words into textarea. ^ ^
Comment 8•5 years ago
|
||
Oh ok, thanks :)
I thought we had automatic tests for this!
| Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 9•5 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 10•5 years ago
|
||
patch for review
| Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 11•5 years ago
|
||
Ekanan, is it good to go ? :)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 12•5 years ago
|
||
Yeah, it is, good to go. :)
Comment 13•5 years ago
|
||
I'm thrilled to see these words finally getting merged in! Thank you both so much!
Comment 14•5 years ago
|
||
Is there any energy to try to merge the 6k words from Merriam Webster's dictionary that are in this comment: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499593#c407. The list includes every word added to their dictionary between 1920 and 2020 that isn't in Firefox (I checked manually, ugh).
I think adding all of these would go a LONG way towards fixing this issue once and for all so we don't have to rely on onesie-twosie patches like this one.
Comment 15•5 years ago
|
||
The main issue with the 6k words is that it doesn't have the /XXX annotations (ending with ed, ing, etc).
Maybe we could merge as it but I am not sure what we expect in term of quality
Updated•5 years ago
|
Comment 16•5 years ago
|
||
Comment 17•5 years ago
|
||
Yes, dealing with that would be a huge undertaking. If there's a way to automate that, I could take a stab. I wouldn't want to do a perfect job, probably, but just a good enough job that we can land it without people being annoyed/confused/etc.
Comment 18•5 years ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
Description
•