Closed
Bug 168883
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 18 years ago
detection of {ib} situations needs to happen in ContentInserted, ContentAppended, and elsewhere
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect, P5)
Core
Layout
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
Future
People
(Reporter: bzbarsky, Assigned: bzbarsky)
References
(Depends on 1 open bug)
Details
Right now we only detect {ib} situations in ConstructInline... so dynamic
changes to the tree can easily not lead to things that _should_ be special being
marked as such. We should fix that (or handle {ib} in reflow as dbaron once
suggested, I guess).
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
marking some dependencies.... thare are probably a few more I missed. I really
would prefer to see us move towards doing this in reflow, though.
Handling {ib} during reflow is bug 142585, and I'd certainly prefer that. It
would probably be less work than fixing all of these messy issues with the
current handling.
Updated•22 years ago
|
QA Contact: petersen → moied
![]() |
Assignee | |
Updated•22 years ago
|
Priority: P4 → P5
![]() |
Assignee | |
Comment 3•18 years ago
|
||
So at this point, I think WipeContainingBlock() pretty much covers what this bug is about. I haven't been able to come up with a scenario in which ContentAppended or ContentInserted fails, and the various dependent bugs are OK.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 18 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•