Closed
Bug 171129
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Alert box titlebar should be &brandShortName; instead of "Alert" or "[Javascript Application]"
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: UI Design, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 298934
People
(Reporter: bamm, Assigned: bugzilla)
References
Details
The default titlebar text of alert boxes should be the &brandShortName; entity
instead of the generic "Alert" or "[Javascript Application]" because these
cannot be appreciated by ordinary people who are not web developers.
In fact, the term [Javascript Application] can scare off newbies into thinking
that some program is taking over their computer. Just putting the title of the
browser makes the experience a lot smoother.
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 171130 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
Part of the reason was for security (I thought) - we don't want people to
create alert boxes that look like they might originate from the browser.
Having said that, IE's alert dialog is titled 'Microsoft Internet Explorer'.
Perhaps this isn't an issue anymore? I guess people know that web pages can
produce alert dialogs, after all.
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
This looks to be asking for the opposite of bug 31573. Would it make more sense
for the alert/confirm to grab the title of the web page? Or to explictly say
"Web page alert"? Also see bug 132279.
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
Yes, I do think so. What goes on internally should be hidden from the user. A
message box is a message box. And like all other applications, the default title
of a message box should be the name of the application.
See http://www.mozilla.org/unity-of-interface.html
Since the "opposite" bug 31573 lived in DOM0, this probably belongs there as well.
Assignee: asa → jst
Component: Browser-General → DOM Level 0
QA Contact: asa → desale
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
Not a DOM problem, over to XP Apps.
Assignee: jst → blaker
Component: DOM Level 0 → XP Apps: GUI Features
QA Contact: desale → paw
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•21 years ago
|
||
Any development on this?
Comment 8•21 years ago
|
||
I wouldn't mind replacing "JavaScript application" with "Web page dialog".
Replacing it with the site's hostname would make even more sense. Replacing it
with "Firefox" would be wrong (the dialog comes from the site, not Firefox) and
bad for security.
Comment 9•21 years ago
|
||
I agree w/Jesse. "[Javascript Application]" isn't all that helpful but we *must*
prevent the ability for spoofs to look like the app created the dialog. As
written this bug is a WONTFIX.
Something with the hostname would be better, to prevent one page from spoofing
another. Should this page morph into "improve the js alert (etc) title"?
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•21 years ago
|
||
How about replacing it with the title of the page that called it? Do users
really distinguish between dialogs made by the app and the page? I don't see
any reason why "Mozilla" or "Firefox" would be dangerous. It's clean and fits
into the small titlebar like a dialog title is supposed to.
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Core → Mozilla Application Suite
Comment 11•20 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 298934 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•