Apply fix from bug 1706261 to the libwebrtc import from bug 1654112
Categories
(Core :: WebRTC: Audio/Video, defect, P2)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: bwc, Assigned: gaston)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
|
1.51 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
|
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
diannaS
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Review |
Updated•4 years ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•4 years ago
|
||
afaict the problem shown in bug 1706261 is still valid with newer webrtc so https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D116746 should be reapplied to https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/third_party/libwebrtc/rtc_base/platform_thread.cc#187 in beta & m-c ?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•4 years ago
•
|
||
[Tracking Requested - why for this release]: reapply the fix from bug #1706261 after bug #1654112 that landed for 96
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•4 years ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•4 years ago
|
||
attachment backports/reapplies https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D116746 on top of the webrtc update.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 5•4 years ago
|
||
Let's see if I can just re-land that phabricator revision.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 6•4 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 7•4 years ago
|
||
| Reporter | ||
Comment 8•4 years ago
|
||
Unfortunately cannot simply re-land, since the file moved. Will need to go through the phabricator dance one more time.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 10•4 years ago
|
||
thanks a lot !
Comment 12•4 years ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 13•4 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9256165 [details]
Bug 1714115: Re-apply fix from bug 1706261 that was lost in bug 1654112. r?ng
Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request
- User impact if declined: fix race conditions leading to tab crashes with multiple connecting webrtc clients (eg bug #1706261)
- Is this code covered by automated tests?: No
- Has the fix been verified in Nightly?: Yes
- Needs manual test from QE?: No
- If yes, steps to reproduce:
- List of other uplifts needed: None
- Risk to taking this patch: Low
- Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): not risky as it's been shipped to all users for the previous webrtc lifetime
- String changes made/needed: none
| Reporter | ||
Updated•4 years ago
|
Comment 14•4 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9256165 [details]
Bug 1714115: Re-apply fix from bug 1706261 that was lost in bug 1654112. r?ng
Approved for 96.0b8
Comment 15•4 years ago
|
||
| bugherder uplift | ||
Updated•4 years ago
|
Description
•