JavaScript Error: "TypeError: can't access property "remoteTab", browser.frameLoader is null" {file: "resource://gre/modules/GeckoViewWebExtension.jsm" line: 547}]
Categories
(GeckoView :: Extensions, defect)
Tracking
(firefox-esr91 unaffected, firefox99 unaffected, firefox100 wontfix, firefox101 fixed)
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox-esr91 | --- | unaffected |
firefox99 | --- | unaffected |
firefox100 | --- | wontfix |
firefox101 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: whimboo, Assigned: calu)
References
(Regression)
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(1 file)
As noticed while investigating a perma failure for our CDP support on Android I noticed that the following Javascript error in the adb logcat which actually causes our tests to fail which have Fission enabled. It wasn't visible by last week so I assume it's a recent regression.
04-25 22:14:44.486 7296 7322 E GeckoConsole: [JavaScript Error: "TypeError: can't access property "remoteTab", browser.frameLoader is null" {file: "resource://gre/modules/GeckoViewWebExtension.jsm" line: 547}]
04-25 22:14:44.486 7296 7322 E GeckoConsole: setTabActive@resource://gre/modules/GeckoViewWebExtension.jsm:547:9
04-25 22:14:44.486 7296 7322 E GeckoConsole: onEvent@resource://gre/modules/GeckoViewTab.jsm:219:29
04-25 22:14:44.486 7296 7322 E GeckoConsole: _dispatch@resource://gre/modules/GeckoViewModule.jsm:147:21
04-25 22:14:44.486 7296 7322 E GeckoConsole: onEvent@resource://gre/modules/GeckoViewModule.jsm:135:12
Agi, do you have an idea?
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•3 years ago
|
||
Note that a try build from April 19th was fine:
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/jobs?repo=try&revision=b5a0fe10649506996a9d0ce9bf3a15c8f4779997&searchStr=android
So probably a recent regression?
Comment 2•3 years ago
|
||
This is a regression from Bug 1753700, Cathy maybe we can also add a check for browser.frameLoader
?
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 3•3 years ago
|
||
Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1753700
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 4•3 years ago
|
||
Is this affecting users or just breaking tests? Checking to see if it is something we need to prioritize for fx100 once fixed.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•3 years ago
|
||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 8•3 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/b4233995982f
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/cbb7f90e083f
Comment 9•3 years ago
|
||
I think this can only affect system pages like about:
, so I wouldn't think it's something we need to uplift.
Updated•3 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 10•2 years ago
|
||
Moving some WebExtension bugs to the GeckoView::Extensions component.
Description
•