CSS Parsing Done Incorrectly since 04.27 Update
Categories
(Core :: CSS Parsing and Computation, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: qjfkcovb3, Unassigned)
References
(Regression)
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(1 file)
51.78 KB,
text/plain
|
Details |
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:101.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/101.0
Steps to reproduce:
All extensions transitioning light <-> dark CSS do not work correctly since 04.27 update. (e.g. Dark Reader)
Already contacted Dark Reader dev team, and figured that it was due to changed implemented by Nightly.
Link:
https://github.com/darkreader/darkreader/issues/8789
Actual results:
For picture illustration:
Expected results:
.
Comment 1•3 years ago
|
||
The Bugbug bot thinks this bug should belong to the 'Core::CSS Parsing and Computation' component, and is moving the bug to that component. Please correct in case you think the bot is wrong.
I think I have the regression range for it, but I'm not 100% certain since the issue is appears a bit inconsistently. Note that this affects both Fenix and Firefox Nightly on desktop.
Affected webpages: Random but somewhat prominent on google.com, askubuntu.com etc.
To reproduce:
- Install Dark Reader in a fresh profile (no settings modification needed).
- Open some websites for example do a google search.
- Page is stuck in a transitional state between light <-> dark theme (see screenshot).
- A few refreshes/toggling the extension on/off makes the page normal but issue appears again on new page load.
$ mozregression --good 2022-04-25 --bad 2022-04-30
Last good revision: 17d94894a53a39e46f1877587f01d7719d7b927d
First bad revision: b5c0bdafaf5ede49311c48d5b143f1b7320e15bb
Pushlog: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/pushloghtml?fromchange=17d94894a53a39e46f1877587f01d7719d7b927d&tochange=b5c0bdafaf5ede49311c48d5b143f1b7320e15bb
Ah, forgot to add that flipping layout.css.constructable-stylesheets.enabled
to false
seems to fix the issue for me.
Looks like duplicate of https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1766909
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 5•3 years ago
|
||
:emilio, since you are the author of the regressor, bug 1644102, could you take a look?
For more information, please visit auto_nag documentation.
Updated•3 years ago
|
Description
•