177287 - Crashes when I try to print this page.

Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 176030

(Core :: Printing: Output, defect)

Description

[Scott Turner]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021014 Phoenix/0.3
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021014 Phoenix/0.3

Crashes when I try to print this page.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual Results:  
"0x00000901" referenced "0x00000901" which could not be "read"


Page prints fine with Mozilla.

Comment 1

[Simon Paquet [:sipaq]]

Confirming with latest Phoenix (20021028) and Mozilla (2002102814) builds
running under W2K SP3. Both crash when printing the given URL. See TB13237353G.
I'm raising severity to critical and changing product to Mozilla browser.

Comment 2

[Simon Paquet [:sipaq]]

Reassigning new bug to printing experts.

Comment 3

[Daniel Clemente]

Confirmed also on Linux 2002102804

Comment 4

[rods (gone)]

nsBlockFrame::VerifyOverflowSituation(nsIPresContext * 0x03de9518) line 6776 + 3
bytes
nsBlockFrame::DrainOverflowLines(nsIPresContext * 0x03de9518) line 4621
nsBlockFrame::Reflow(nsBlockFrame * const 0x03fbd128, nsIPresContext *
0x03de9518, nsHTMLReflowMetrics & {...}, const nsHTMLReflowState & {...},
unsigned int & 0) line 934
nsContainerFrame::ReflowChild(nsIFrame * 0x03fbd128, nsIPresContext *
0x03de9518, nsHTMLReflowMetrics & {...}, const nsHTMLReflowState & {...}, int
14, int 1582, unsigned int 0, unsigned int & 0) line 926 + 31 bytes
nsTableCellFrame::Reflow(nsTableCellFrame * const 0x03fbd0c8, nsIPresContext *
0x03de9518, nsHTMLReflowMetrics & {...}, const nsHTMLReflowState & {...},
unsigned int & 0) line 951
nsContainerFrame::ReflowChild(nsIFrame * 0x03fbd0c8, nsIPresContext *
0x03de9518, nsHTMLReflowMetrics & {...}, const nsHTMLReflowState & {...}, int 0,
int 0, unsigned int 0, unsigned int & 0) line 926 + 31 bytes
nsTableRowFrame::ReflowChildren(nsTableRowFrame * const 0x03fbd030,
nsIPresContext * 0x03de9518, nsHTMLReflowMetrics & {...}, const
nsHTMLReflowState & {...}, nsTableFrame & {...}, unsigned int & 0, int 0) line
1054 + 45 bytes
nsTableRowFrame::Reflow(nsTableRowFrame * const 0x03fbd030, nsIPresContext *
0x03de9518, nsHTMLReflowMetrics & {...}, const nsHTMLReflowState & {...},
unsigned int & 0) line 1467 + 37 bytes
nsContainerFrame::ReflowChild(nsIFrame * 0x03fbd030, nsIPresContext *
0x03de9518, nsHTMLReflowMetrics & {...}, const nsHTMLReflowState & {...}, int 0,
int 28084, unsigned int 0, unsigned int & 0) line 926 + 31 bytes
nsTableRowGroupFrame::ReflowChildren(nsTableRowGroupFrame * const 0x03faccf4,
nsIPresContext * 0x03de9518, nsHTMLReflowMetrics & {...}, nsRowGroupReflowState
& {...}, unsigned int & 0, nsTableRowFrame * 0x00000000, int 0, nsTableRowFrame
* * 0x00000000, int * 0x00129ae8) line 444 + 45 bytes
nsTableRowGroupFrame::Reflow(nsTableRowGroupFrame * const 0x03faccf4,
nsIPresContext * 0x03de9518, nsHTMLReflowMetrics & {...}, const
nsHTMLReflowState & {...}, unsigned int & 0) line 1342 + 35 bytes
nsContainerFrame::ReflowChild(nsIFrame * 0x03faccf4, nsIPresContext *
0x03de9518, nsHTMLReflowMetrics & {...}, const nsHTMLReflowState & {...}, int
14, int 14, unsigned int 0, unsigned int & 0) line 926 + 31 bytes
nsTableFrame::ReflowChildren(nsTableFrame * const 0x03facc6c, nsIPresContext *
0x03de9518, nsTableReflowState & {...}, int 1, int 0, unsigned int & 0, nsIFrame
* & 0x00000000, int * 0x00000000) line 3304 + 50 bytes
nsTableFrame::ReflowTable(nsIPresContext * 0x03de9518, nsHTMLReflowMetrics &
{...}, const nsHTMLReflowState & {...}, int 1073741824, nsReflowReason
eReflowReason_Resize, nsIFrame * & 0x00000000, int & 0, int & 1, unsigned int &
0) line 2204
nsTableFrame::Reflow(nsTableFrame * const 0x03facc6c, nsIPresContext *
0x03de9518, nsHTMLReflowMetrics & {...}, const nsHTMLReflowState & {...},
unsigned int & 0) line 2070

Comment 5

[karnaze (gone)]

Probably a dup of bug 176030, but I can't verify it right now.

Comment 6

[Andrew Schultz]

the patch in bug 176030 does fix the crash here.

Comment 7

[Daniel Clemente]

Then it is a dupe of bug 176030

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 176030 ***

Comment 8

[sujay]

verified.