Closed
Bug 1777341
Opened 2 years ago
Closed 2 years ago
QuoVadis: "unexpired but revoked" constrained CAs unable to be reported in CCADB
Categories
(CA Program :: CA Certificate Root Program, task)
CA Program
CA Certificate Root Program
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: stephen.davidson, Assigned: bwilson)
Details
Attachments
(10 files)
This post is in response to Ben Wilson's email requesting that "unexpired but revoked CA certificates" be reported in CCADB.
The email noted that some CA certificates may be too large to add to CCDAB due to size of the technical constraints. Such is the case with the following previously revoked CAs.
|
Reporter | |
Comment 1•2 years ago
|
||
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 2•2 years ago
|
||
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 3•2 years ago
|
||
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 4•2 years ago
|
||
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 5•2 years ago
|
||
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 6•2 years ago
|
||
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 7•2 years ago
|
||
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 8•2 years ago
|
||
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 9•2 years ago
|
||
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 10•2 years ago
|
||
|
Assignee | |
Updated•2 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 2 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
|
||
Comment 12•2 years ago
|
||
Per Bug #1778536, we're going to look into increasing the PEM field size in the CCADB.
|
|
||
Comment 13•2 years ago
|
||
Clearing my needinfo, because this will be tracked via Bug #1778536 which is lower in priority than updating audit and root inclusion cases to the new work flow.
Flags: needinfo?(kwilson)
|
|
||
Comment 14•2 years ago
|
||
I ended up adding these by hand to CCADB production.
Resolution: WORKSFORME → FIXED
|
||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Product: NSS → CA Program
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•