Closed
Bug 178180
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
|nsCOMPtr|: is it time to remove the |address_of| hack?
Categories
(Core :: XPCOM, enhancement)
Core
XPCOM
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 132278
People
(Reporter: scc, Assigned: scc)
References
Details
|nsCOMPtr| has extra machinery, the intent of which was to discourage clients
from applying old-style casts to |nsCOMPtr|s, and/or pass them by address.
Maybe this machinery has outlived its usefulness, and it's time to simplify. If
we remove this machinery, will transgressions be caught in review? Did this
machinery ever really discourage the kind of misuse it targeted?
Assignee | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Blocks: nsCOMPtr_tracking
![]() |
||
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
It certainly made users of address_of very obvious and people have been slowly
eliminating them as a result....
Assignee | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Severity: normal → enhancement
I thought we already removed the private operator&.
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
I found several instances in the plugin code that use operator & on an nsCOMPtr.
So I think the answers to "Will the transgressions be caught in review" is no.
http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/source/embedding/browser/activex/src/plugin/XPConnect.cpp#761
And yes, if there was a private operator &, it was removed.
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
FYI, filed bug 189296 for the plugin code
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
Marking this a dupe of bug 132278
I came across the original bug that dealt with this. And read the explanation
for removing it, so sounds like a good idea. Also the plugin code looks to be
the only code that abuses taking an address of an nsCOMPtr.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 132278 ***
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•