Tracking the update to NSPR 4.34.1 (correctness fixes)
Categories
(Firefox Build System :: General, enhancement)
Tracking
(firefox-esr91 wontfix, firefox-esr102104+ fixed, firefox103 wontfix, firefox104+ fixed, firefox105+ fixed)
People
(Reporter: KaiE, Assigned: KaiE)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
diannaS
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
RyanVM
:
approval-mozilla-esr102+
|
Details | Review |
I'd like to fix one or two correctness issues in NSPR. There haven't been any changes to NSPR after the release of 4.34 yet, so doing a 4.34.1 release seems best.
Assignee | ||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Updated•3 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•3 years ago
|
||
NSPR_4_34_1_BETA1 tagged, decided to include bug 1760611, only.
Testing that NSPR works with NSS test suite:
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/jobs?repo=nss&revision=6d025c93055451074cf975089701faf3f221e519
Testing that NSPR works with Firefox:
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/jobs?repo=try&revision=581456b306cb4b029f86b3ffed0478bc8ccc7f72
If all good, I'll release NSPR 4.34.1 today.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•3 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Kai Engert (:KaiE:) from comment #1)
Testing that NSPR works with Firefox:
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/jobs?repo=try&revision=581456b306cb4b029f86b3ffed0478bc8ccc7f72
Ryan, that one produced "271 possible regressions".
I somehow don't believe this commit caused all those regressions. Is that the normal amount of test failures?
Comment 3•3 years ago
|
||
At a very cursory glance, it looks like a lot of test suites were run which don't actually run in our normal CI (compare to https://treeherder.mozilla.org/jobs?repo=mozilla-central). Looks like a lot of known intermittents otherwise. If in doubt, you can always ask in the #sheriffs channel in Matrix as well - they'll have more experience with "normal" levels of intermittents these days :)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•3 years ago
|
||
The updated try build, using parameters recommended by sheriffs, still has 72 failures. But all failures appear to link to intermittent bugs. I think the patch should be fine.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•3 years ago
|
||
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 7•3 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Comment 8•3 years ago
|
||
Please nominate this for Beta & ESR102 approval when you get a chance.
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•3 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9288557 [details]
Bug 1782740 - Update to NSPR 4.34.1 RTM. r=bbeurdouche UPGRADE_NSPR_RELEASE
Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request
- User impact if declined: none
- Is this code covered by automated tests?: Yes
- Has the fix been verified in Nightly?: Yes
- Needs manual test from QE?: No
- If yes, steps to reproduce:
- List of other uplifts needed: None
- Risk to taking this patch: Low
- Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): Simple correctness/bounds check
- String changes made/needed:
- Is Android affected?: Unknown
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•3 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9288557 [details]
Bug 1782740 - Update to NSPR 4.34.1 RTM. r=bbeurdouche UPGRADE_NSPR_RELEASE
ESR Uplift Approval Request
- If this is not a sec:{high,crit} bug, please state case for ESR consideration: fixes sec-high bug 1760611
- User impact if declined: none
- Fix Landed on Version: 102
- Risk to taking this patch: Low
- Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): simple bounds checking fix
Comment 11•3 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9288557 [details]
Bug 1782740 - Update to NSPR 4.34.1 RTM. r=bbeurdouche UPGRADE_NSPR_RELEASE
Approved for 104.0b8
Comment 12•3 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
Comment 13•3 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9288557 [details]
Bug 1782740 - Update to NSPR 4.34.1 RTM. r=bbeurdouche UPGRADE_NSPR_RELEASE
Approved for 102.2esr.
Comment 14•3 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
Description
•