Closed Bug 178590 Opened 22 years ago Closed 20 years ago

fix compiler warning in string/public/nsBufferHandleUtils.h

Categories

(Core :: XPCOM, defect)

defect
Not set
trivial

Tracking

()

RESOLVED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: benjamin, Assigned: benjamin)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

This is just a little patch that fixes a minor compiler warning in string/public/nsBufferHandleUtils.h -- line 71 has an assignment inside an if().
Attached patch -u patchSplinter Review
-u patch
Which compiler? I thought compilers would warn for if ( foo = bar ) but not for if ( (foo = bar) ) Regardless, there is nothing wrong with an assigment inside an if, it's nice that the compiler tries to tell us we may have meant == instead of =, but I don't think we need to make this change just to make some compiler not warn.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Summary: fix compiler warning in string/public/nsBufferHandleUtils.h → fix compiler warning in string/public/nsBufferHandleUtils.h
Compiler is MSVC6 (warning-level 4) I normally don't care about warnings in mozilla source files, but this is a header that I was including (through nsASharableString) in another application, and getting warnings on each source file that included it. Truly it doesn't make a big difference, but the change can't hurt, can it? I thought that providing a patch might make it a painless fix ;)
Alec, dbaron, what do you two think? It's a shame MSVC6 doesn't take the parentheses hint that this was really what we meant and not a typo.
Making the change is ok with me. Just wait to check it in until something else comes around that triggers a world-rebuild.
Comment on attachment 105288 [details] [diff] [review] -u patch sounds fine to me too. sr=alecf
Attachment #105288 - Flags: superreview+
Reopening per comments. This is obviously not urgent, so it could wait even until the 1.4 tree opening if need be.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: WONTFIX → ---
Comment on attachment 105288 [details] [diff] [review] -u patch r=jag
Attachment #105288 - Flags: review+
Blocks: buildwarning
Mine, this will go in after 1.4
Assignee: jaggernaut → bsmedberg
Status: REOPENED → NEW
Priority: -- → P5
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.5alpha
Comment on attachment 105288 [details] [diff] [review] -u patch bsmedberg (or anyone): Can you check in your r+/sr+ patch ? Thanks.
Retargeting: v1.5a -> v1.7a.
Severity: minor → trivial
OS: Windows 2000 → All
Hardware: PC → All
Target Milestone: mozilla1.5alpha → mozilla1.7alpha
This code has disappeared ;)
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago20 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Priority: P5 → --
Target Milestone: mozilla1.7alpha → ---
Component: String → XPCOM
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: