Consider dropping the non-fission puppeteer job
Categories
(Remote Protocol :: CDP, task, P1)
Tracking
(firefox106 fixed)
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox106 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: Sasha, Assigned: whimboo)
Details
(Whiteboard: [webdriver:m4])
Attachments
(1 file)
Since the support for non-fission builds should stop at some point, we can consider also dropping a puppeteer non-fission job. This job also cases usually more issues.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•2 years ago
|
||
To add my 2c quickly, we do no longer request Fission to be disabled for CDP for quite some time (bug 1601245).
As such I wonder how important non Fission tests actually are for Puppeteer. We should discuss if they really give a value to us seeing the costs and not being able to differentiate our expectation test data between both test types.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•2 years ago
|
||
When discussing this topic we agreed on in our team that those non-Fission tests aren't valuable for us.
Joel do you have any objections in getting this test configuration removed?
Comment 3•2 years ago
|
||
non fission tests only run for the purpose of supporting geckoview until that is fission by default- so if the value of puppeteer is null for geckoview this is a no brainer. If there is a high value in keeping this around to test code for geckoview we should keep it around for another 6 months or so.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•2 years ago
|
||
Our Puppeteer support is desktop only. As such it's not valuable at all to continue running these tests in non-Fission mode. I'm going to remove this test configuration.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•2 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 7•2 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Description
•