Closed
Bug 179293
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
time tracking js should only appear if time tracking is enabled
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Creating/Changing Bugs, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 2.18
People
(Reporter: bbaetz, Assigned: jeff.hedlund)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
1.82 KB,
patch
|
bbaetz
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
enter_bug sends the inline js all the time; it should only do so if the
appropriate param is set
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
Fix...
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
Assigning to me.
I assume you meant the js in show_bug...
Assignee: myk → jeff.hedlund
| Assignee | ||
Updated•23 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 105793 [details] [diff] [review]
patch v.1
Assuming that a diff -w will only show the IF and the END, r=bbaetz
As a side note, I've noticed that a lot of stuff just checks if the user is in
the group, w/o checking if the param is set first. Whilst we don't allow empty
groups, thats still involving an sql query, so you may want to file a separate
bug to prefix those with a test for existence first
Attachment #105793 -
Flags: review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•23 years ago
|
||
> Assuming that a diff -w will only show the IF and the END, r=bbaetz
The other drivel is indentions from the diff -u. Are the indentions not necessary?
> As a side note, I've noticed that a lot of stuff just checks if the user is in
> the group, w/o checking if the param is set first. Whilst we don't allow empty
> groups, thats still involving an sql query, so you may want to file a separate
> bug to prefix those with a test for existence first
From bug 24789 comment 105, I took the "redundant" param checks out. ?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 5•23 years ago
|
||
Yeah, you should move hte indent, but its hard to see whats going on that way ;)
Re the extra checks, you may as well leave them. Gerv's right in that the result
will be the same, but it will cause an extra db hit in theory.
In practice, its likly to be cached, and will (for the logged in user, which is
all you care about here) soon definatley be cached, once I get arround to making
Bugzilla::User a reality
| Reporter | ||
Comment 6•23 years ago
|
||
dave, a=?
jeff, do you have checkin access? I can't recall.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•23 years ago
|
||
> jeff, do you have checkin access? I can't recall.
Yes, I do have checkin access now.
Comment 8•23 years ago
|
||
a= justdave
| Reporter | ||
Comment 9•23 years ago
|
||
jeff's cvs access wasn't set up corrrectly, so I checked this in for him
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•23 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.18
Updated•13 years ago
|
QA Contact: matty_is_a_geek → default-qa
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•