Mozilla-specific wording in duplicates.cgi explanation text

RESOLVED FIXED in Bugzilla 2.18

Status

()

Bugzilla
Documentation
P3
minor
RESOLVED FIXED
15 years ago
4 years ago

People

(Reporter: Vitaly Fedrushkov, Assigned: gerv)

Tracking

2.17.1
Bugzilla 2.18
Bug Flags:
approval +

Details

(URL)

Attachments

(1 attachment)

(Reporter)

Description

15 years ago
User-Agent:       Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0; Q312461)
Build Identifier: 2.16.1

Report explanation at

http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/duplicates.cgi#explanation

directly mentions Mozilla.

Not good for generic Bugzilla installation.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
(not applicable)
Actual Results:  
"The Most Frequent Bugs page lists the known open bugs which are reported most 
frequently in recent builds of Mozilla. It is automatically generated from the 
Bugzilla database every 24 hours, by counting the number of direct and indirect 
duplicates of bugs."
(Reporter)

Updated

15 years ago
Version: unspecified → 2.16.1
confriming. gerv?
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
(Reporter)

Comment 2

15 years ago
In addition, link to Bugzilla Helper below 
(http://www.mozilla.org/quality/help/bug-form.html) is dead
(Assignee)

Comment 3

15 years ago
Hmm. I thought that this was a separate, customisable template, but it's not. So
this should be fixed - and we can link directly to the guided format, also.

Gerv
Assignee: matthew → gerv
Severity: trivial → minor
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.18
Version: 2.16.1 → 2.17.1
(Assignee)

Updated

15 years ago
Priority: -- → P3
(Assignee)

Comment 4

15 years ago
Created attachment 110936 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v.1

This tidies up the wording in several places, including removing the Mozilla
reference.

Gerv
(Assignee)

Comment 5

15 years ago
Comment on attachment 110936 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v.1

Dave - could you rubber-stamp this and approve it, please?

Gerv
Attachment #110936 - Flags: review?(justdave)
Comment on attachment 110936 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v.1

nit:

If you fixed this:

>-  <li>If problem is listed:</li>
>+  <li>If your problem is listed:</li>

Shouldn't you also fix this the same way:

>    <li>If problem not listed:</li>

?

fix that and r= justdave
Attachment #110936 - Flags: review?(justdave) → review+
Flags: approval+
(Assignee)

Comment 7

15 years ago
Fixed.

Checking in template/en/default/reports/duplicates.html.tmpl;
/cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/default/reports/duplicates.html.tmpl,v
 <--  duplicates.html.tmpl
new revision: 1.9; previous revision: 1.8
done

Gerv
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Summary: Irrelevant wording in report explanation → Mozilla-specific wording in duplicates.cgi explanation text
QA Contact: matty_is_a_geek → default-qa
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.