Closed
Bug 181602
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 21 years ago
Convert accessible/ to use the newer pref APIs
Categories
(Core :: Disability Access APIs, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: caillon, Assigned: caillon)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
4.64 KB,
patch
|
aaronlev
:
review+
peterv
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
2.10 KB,
patch
|
caillon
:
review+
peterv
:
superreview+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Assignee | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Summary: Convert accessibility/ to use the newer pref APIs → Convert accessible/ to use the newer pref APIs
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
Comment 2•22 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 107227 [details] [diff] [review]
The patch
r=aaronl
Attachment #107227 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Attachment #107227 -
Flags: superreview?(peterv)
Updated•22 years ago
|
Attachment #107227 -
Flags: superreview?(peterv) → superreview+
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
Checked in.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.3alpha
Comment 4•21 years ago
|
||
some files using nsIPref again. Patch coming up
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 5•21 years ago
|
||
who reviews for accessible/ ?
Updated•21 years ago
|
Target Milestone: mozilla1.3alpha → ---
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•21 years ago
|
||
Please don't reopen bugs which were fixed at one point. This should have stayed
fixed, and a new bug opened.
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 138630 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
>- nsCOMPtr<nsIPref> prefService(do_GetService(kPrefCID));
>+ nsCOMPtr<nsIPrefBranch> prefService(do_GetService(NS_PREFSERVICE_CONTRACTID));
Don't lie. nsIPref is a service, so it is legit to call the variable
|prefService|. nsIPrefBranch is not a service, so it is bogus to store one in
a variable with service in the name.
Attachment #138630 -
Flags: review-
Comment 8•21 years ago
|
||
Sorry about the reopen. Should this be closed again and a new opened?
Comment 9•21 years ago
|
||
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #138630 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 10•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 139179 [details] [diff] [review]
with caillons comments [checked in 20040123]
r/sr/rs?
Attachment #139179 -
Flags: superreview?
Attachment #139179 -
Flags: review?(caillon)
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 139179 [details] [diff] [review]
with caillons comments [checked in 20040123]
Yes, a new one should have been opened.
Attachment #139179 -
Flags: review?(caillon) → review+
Comment 12•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 139179 [details] [diff] [review]
with caillons comments [checked in 20040123]
Asking peterv for sr, since he already sr'ed the first patch two years ago.
Attachment #139179 -
Flags: superreview? → superreview?(peterv)
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #139179 -
Flags: superreview?(peterv) → superreview+
Updated•21 years ago
|
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago → 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•21 years ago
|
Attachment #139179 -
Attachment description: with caillons comments → with caillons comments [checked in 20040123]
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•