55568.08 - 37191.66% twitch-animation / twitch-animation + 1 more (Linux, OSX, Windows) regression on Thu February 9 2023
Categories
(Core :: Performance, defect)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox-esr102 | --- | unaffected |
firefox110 | --- | unaffected |
firefox111 | --- | wontfix |
firefox112 | --- | wontfix |
People
(Reporter: afinder, Unassigned)
References
(Regression)
Details
(Keywords: perf, perf-alert, regression)
Perfherder has detected a browsertime performance regression from push 970bcb73de2cd98cefdd56aa7a8e92ab719aff3e. As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression.
Regressions:
Ratio | Test | Platform | Options | Absolute values (old vs new) | Performance Profiles |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
55568% | twitch-animation | macosx1015-64-shippable-qr | fission webrender | 21.65 -> 12,050.28 | Before/After |
44241% | twitch-animation | windows10-64-shippable-qr | fission webrender | 27.26 -> 12,088.49 | Before/After |
37192% | twitch-animation | linux1804-64-shippable-qr | fission webrender | 32.43 -> 12,093.07 | Before/After |
Improvements:
Ratio | Test | Platform | Options | Absolute values (old vs new) | Performance Profiles |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5% | instagram SpeedIndex | linux1804-64-shippable-qr | bytecode-cached fission warm webrender | 543.67 -> 516.67 | Before/After |
Details of the alert can be found in the alert summary, including links to graphs and comparisons for each of the affected tests. Please follow our guide to handling regression bugs and let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the offending patch(es) may be backed out in accordance with our regression policy.
If you need the profiling jobs you can trigger them yourself from treeherder job view or ask a sheriff to do that for you.
For more information on performance sheriffing please see our FAQ.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•2 years ago
|
||
Hi sparky! Should we close this alert and bug as WON'T FIX ?
Comment 2•2 years ago
|
||
Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1813515
Comment 3•2 years ago
|
||
Yup, WONTFIX sounds good to me, thanks! The issue here happened because we changed how the summary is calculated.
Updated•2 years ago
|
Description
•