Closed
Bug 1820195
Opened 2 years ago
Closed 2 years ago
Integer Preferences getting converted to boolean values in preferences policy
Categories
(Firefox :: Enterprise Policies, defect, P2)
Firefox
Enterprise Policies
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
112 Branch
People
(Reporter: mkaply, Assigned: mkaply)
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
Details | Review | |
3.99 KB,
patch
|
RyanVM
:
approval-mozilla-esr102+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
See:
https://github.com/mozilla/policy-templates/issues/1003
With a Preferences value of
{
"pdfjs.cursorToolOnLoad": {
"Value": 1,
"Status": "user"
},
"pdfjs.sidebarViewOnLoad": {
"Value": 0,
"Status": "user"
}
}
You end up with booleans in about:config.
- This shouldn't happen.
- This shouldn't be possible because these prefs already exist as default values with ints.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•2 years ago
|
||
Pushed by mozilla@kaply.com:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/34f61f1d8186
Special case pdfjs preferences in policy. r=hjones
Comment 3•2 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 2 years ago
status-firefox112:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → 112 Branch
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•2 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9321082 [details]
Bug 1820195 - Special case pdfjs preferences in policy. r?mstriemer
ESR Uplift Approval Request
- If this is not a sec:{high,crit} bug, please state case for ESR consideration: Policy only fix, related to enterprise
- User impact if declined: Some PDFjs prefs can't be set via policy
- Fix Landed on Version: 113
- Risk to taking this patch: Low
- Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): Policy only, automated test.
Attachment #9321082 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-esr102?
Comment 5•2 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9321082 [details]
Bug 1820195 - Special case pdfjs preferences in policy. r?mstriemer
This needs a rebased patch for ESR.
Flags: needinfo?(mozilla)
Attachment #9321082 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-esr102?
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•2 years ago
|
||
Flags: needinfo?(mozilla)
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•2 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9325733 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch against ESR102
ESR Uplift Approval Request
- If this is not a sec:{high,crit} bug, please state case for ESR consideration: Policy only fix, related to enterprise
- User impact if declined: Some PDFjs prefs can't be set via policy
- Fix Landed on Version: 113
- Risk to taking this patch: Low
- Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): Policy only, automated test.
Attachment #9325733 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-esr102?
Comment 8•2 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9325733 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch against ESR102
Approved for 102.10esr.
Attachment #9325733 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-esr102? → approval-mozilla-esr102+
Comment 9•2 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
status-firefox-esr102:
--- → fixed
Flags: in-testsuite+
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•