Hazard analysis failures are not causing the job to fail
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript: GC, defect)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox-esr102 | --- | unaffected |
firefox113 | --- | wontfix |
firefox114 | --- | wontfix |
firefox115 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: sfink, Assigned: sfink)
References
(Regression)
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(2 files)
The hazard analysis is logging errors and creating artifacts for them, but the build is showing up green.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•2 years ago
|
||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•2 years ago
|
||
Comment 3•2 years ago
|
||
Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1817092
Comment 5•2 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/a6602e057003
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/0ef227655399
Comment 6•2 years ago
|
||
The patch landed in nightly and beta is affected.
:sfink, is this bug important enough to require an uplift?
- If yes, please nominate the patch for beta approval.
- If no, please set
status-firefox114
towontfix
.
For more information, please visit BugBot documentation.
Updated•2 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•2 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9336817 [details]
Bug 1836094 - look in the correct file for hazards to fail the job
Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request
- User impact if declined: It's more on our side, where test failures may be missed, and they are test failures that may indicate security bugs.
- Is this code covered by automated tests?: No
- Has the fix been verified in Nightly?: Yes
- Needs manual test from QE?: No
- If yes, steps to reproduce:
- List of other uplifts needed: Bug 1832284, Bug 1835989
- Risk to taking this patch: Low
- Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): There is no risk from these patches themselves, they're just exposing any errors that occur. But it is only landable if there are no errors, and that depends on fixing up the existing errors, so whichever of the dependent bugs needs to land first will need to do that.
- String changes made/needed: none
- Is Android affected?: No
Assignee | ||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•2 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9336817 [details]
Bug 1836094 - look in the correct file for hazards to fail the job
I talked to RyanVM, who pointed out that any errors that got backported would first land on the main branch and so would get checked by a correctly functioning analysis there.
Assignee | ||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Description
•