Closed
Bug 184429
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
Display / rendering problem with DHTML ( nested inline/none - rendering elements)
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Block and Inline, defect)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: gfellerpatrik, Unassigned)
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
130 bytes,
text/html
|
Details |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 I use <table style="display: none;" ... to create hidden elements on my Intranet-Page. With document.getElementById(ElementID).style.display="inline"; document.getElementById(ElementID).style.display="none"; I display (or hide) the Element. I looks fine, until I have nested instances. With nested instances it seems to render the content when I change the stale to inline - but I can only see part of the content (looks like a graphic error). The same code is working fine with IE5+ Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual Results: The page behaves as in the MS browser(s), exept that a part of the now rendered content is just white on the screen (but the other content is moving down - so the chanche to "inline" was successful - but part of the now visible part is just white). Expected Results: The browser should also be able to handle nested inline/none-Render sections proberly. if you need additional information please feel free to contact me : gfellerpatrik@gmx.net
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
Please attach a small (500 bytes or so should be plenty) testcase using http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?bugid=184429&action=enter
Note that this will probably work correctly if you set display to "" instead of "inline", since the default value of display for TABLE elements is "table", not "inline".
Comment 3•22 years ago
|
||
Related to bug 135994?
the solution (from dbaron@fas.harvard.edu) to use "table" instead of "inline" in the code solved the rendering-problem... thanks to all :-)
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
Attachment #108866 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 7•22 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 79315 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•