Closed Bug 1865593 Opened 2 years ago Closed 2 years ago

1.66% apk-size-fenixNightly (Android) regression on Thu November 9 2023

Categories

(GeckoView :: General, defect, P2)

ARM64
Android
defect

Tracking

(firefox120 unaffected, firefox121 wontfix, firefox122 wontfix)

RESOLVED WONTFIX
Tracking Status
firefox120 --- unaffected
firefox121 --- wontfix
firefox122 --- wontfix

People

(Reporter: afinder, Unassigned)

References

(Regression)

Details

(Keywords: perf-alert, regression)

Perfherder has detected a build_metrics performance regression from push f1fb5f0afb5896b5c30e6a9b1439a9c4de4a3db2. As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression.

Regressions:

Ratio Test Platform Options Absolute values (old vs new)
2% apk-size-fenixNightly fenix-android-all 98,372,643.33 -> 100,005,953.67

Details of the alert can be found in the alert summary, including links to graphs and comparisons for each of the affected tests. Please follow our guide to handling regression bugs and let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the patch(es) may be backed out in accordance with our regression policy.

For more information on performance sheriffing please see our FAQ.

Flags: needinfo?(cpeterson)

(In reply to Alex Finder from comment #0)

Regressions:

Ratio Test Platform Options Absolute values (old vs new)
2% apk-size-fenixNightly fenix-android-all 98,372,643.33 -> 100,005,953.67

98,372,643.33 -> 100,005,953.67 = 1595 KB

Jamie, is 1.5 MB about the expected APK size increase we expected from PGO bug 1663700? Should we resolve this bug as WONTFIX?

Severity: -- → S3
Component: Performance → General
Flags: needinfo?(cpeterson) → needinfo?(jnicol)
Priority: -- → P2
Product: Testing → GeckoView
Regressed by: 1663700

That seems about right, perhaps slightly higher than I expected. I was seeing ~1.1MB for the aarch64 geckoview_example pushes I did. What architecture is the above alert tracking?

Even at 1.5MB I'd say the benefit more than outweighs the cost

Flags: needinfo?(jnicol)

(In reply to Jamie Nicol [:jnicol] from comment #2)

That seems about right, perhaps slightly higher than I expected. I was seeing ~1.1MB for the aarch64 geckoview_example pushes I did. What architecture is the above alert tracking?

I don't know which architecture(s) "apk-size-fenixNightly opt" is the same as "apk-size-fenixNightly app-fenix-arm64-v8a-nightly-unsigned.apk opt".

Even at 1.5MB I'd say the benefit more than outweighs the cost

SGTM. In that case, I'll resolve this bug as WONTFIX.

Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 2 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Duplicate of this bug: 1864735
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.