10% regression on AWFY-Jetstream2-base64-SP-Average around 9December2023
Categories
(Core :: Performance, defect)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox-esr115 | --- | unaffected |
firefox120 | --- | unaffected |
firefox121 | --- | unaffected |
firefox122 | --- | wontfix |
firefox123 | --- | wontfix |
People
(Reporter: mayankleoboy1, Unassigned)
References
(Regression)
Details
(Keywords: perf, regression)
Not sure what is the regressing bug.
Jetstream2 is a lower priority benchmark, and the regression is only on a sub-test. Feel free to WONTFIX.
Comment 1•1 year ago
|
||
Not sure if there is anything to see here. On central there seems to be no regression at all (but we have only one data point so far). Randell, maybe you know better how to interpret this? I tend to WONTFIX.
Comment 2•1 year ago
|
||
Definite regression (on this JS2 subtest), by around 8%.
95% certain this is the PGO training change for SP3
Comment 3•1 year ago
|
||
Comment 4•1 year ago
|
||
Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1867581
Comment 5•1 year ago
|
||
(In reply to Randell Jesup [:jesup] (needinfo me) from comment #2)
Definite regression (on this JS2 subtest), by around 8%.
95% certain this is the PGO training change for SP3
Thanks, I was confused by the comparison being with chrome, not firefox on central, actually.
Comment 6•1 year ago
|
||
This bug was moved into the Performance component.
:mayankleoboy1, could you make sure the following information is on this bug?
- For slowness or high CPU usage, capture a profile with http://profiler.firefox.com/, upload it and share the link here.
- For memory usage issues, capture a memory dump from
about:memory
and attach it to this bug. - Troubleshooting information: Go to
about:support
, click "Copy raw data to clipboard", paste it into a file, save it, and attach the file here.
If the requested information is already in the bug, please confirm it is recent.
Thank you.
Reporter | ||
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 7•1 year ago
|
||
Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1867581
Comment 8•1 year ago
|
||
:fdoty could this be triaged?
Fx122 is now in beta, wondering if this can be investigated/fixed in the for release
Comment 9•1 year ago
|
||
I think marking this as WONTFIX should be okay. My thoughts are the following (feel free to correct me!): We got an increase of 1.5% overall on sp3 after landing this whereas this regression is on a subtest of jetstream. I think the trade-off is okay for what we got.
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Description
•