Closed Bug 1869464 Opened 1 year ago Closed 1 year ago

10% regression on AWFY-Jetstream2-base64-SP-Average around 9December2023

Categories

(Core :: Performance, defect)

defect

Tracking

()

RESOLVED WONTFIX
Tracking Status
firefox-esr115 --- unaffected
firefox120 --- unaffected
firefox121 --- unaffected
firefox122 --- wontfix
firefox123 --- wontfix

People

(Reporter: mayankleoboy1, Unassigned)

References

(Regression)

Details

(Keywords: perf, regression)

Not sure if there is anything to see here. On central there seems to be no regression at all (but we have only one data point so far). Randell, maybe you know better how to interpret this? I tend to WONTFIX.

Flags: needinfo?(rjesup)

Definite regression (on this JS2 subtest), by around 8%.
95% certain this is the PGO training change for SP3

Component: General → Performance
Flags: needinfo?(rjesup) → needinfo?(mleclair)
Keywords: perf
Regressed by: 1867581

Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1867581

(In reply to Randell Jesup [:jesup] (needinfo me) from comment #2)

Definite regression (on this JS2 subtest), by around 8%.
95% certain this is the PGO training change for SP3

Thanks, I was confused by the comparison being with chrome, not firefox on central, actually.

This bug was moved into the Performance component.

:mayankleoboy1, could you make sure the following information is on this bug?

  • For slowness or high CPU usage, capture a profile with http://profiler.firefox.com/, upload it and share the link here.
  • For memory usage issues, capture a memory dump from about:memory and attach it to this bug.
  • Troubleshooting information: Go to about:support, click "Copy raw data to clipboard", paste it into a file, save it, and attach the file here.

If the requested information is already in the bug, please confirm it is recent.

Thank you.

Flags: needinfo?(mayankleoboy1)
Flags: needinfo?(mayankleoboy1)

Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1867581

:fdoty could this be triaged?
Fx122 is now in beta, wondering if this can be investigated/fixed in the for release

Flags: needinfo?(fdoty)

I think marking this as WONTFIX should be okay. My thoughts are the following (feel free to correct me!): We got an increase of 1.5% overall on sp3 after landing this whereas this regression is on a subtest of jetstream. I think the trade-off is okay for what we got.

Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 1 year ago
Flags: needinfo?(mleclair)
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Flags: needinfo?(fdoty)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.