Closed Bug 187940 Opened 23 years ago Closed 23 years ago

RFE: Option to block images from a path, i.e., http://www.site.com/ads/images/

Categories

(Core :: Graphics: Image Blocking, enhancement)

x86
Windows NT
enhancement
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 78104

People

(Reporter: squeakman2k1, Assigned: security-bugs)

Details

User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 Block images from server is useful. But what if the site is smart and keeps all ads on its own server? Solution - block images from a path. While not perfect, it would knock out about 90% of the junk images I see because most of the images are organized into different directories on the site. i.e. slashdot stores banners in http://ssads.osdn.com/banner/ . could we block that entire directory? also, newscientist stores images in the following directory, http://www.newscientist.com/data/images/ads/ (plus other subdirectories for different companies). You cannot just block images from the site on certain sites because the site may become [un|less]usable. Let's get the "root" of the problem :) This feature would be cool and that's "the bottom line because Stone Cold said so!" - Lloyd - P.S. Please consider this!!! Please, please, please! Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. go to a site that uses banners 2. look at the banners 3. get annoyed
this is already filed....
Whiteboard: DUPEME
dup of which bug # ? shouldn't that be referenced? maybe i just cannot see bugzilla correctly, sorry.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 78104 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
v.
Severity: major → enhancement
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Whiteboard: DUPEME
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.