Closed
Bug 189073
Opened 22 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
Changing several bugs at once offer inconsistent resolution/status options compared with bug edit/view page
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Query/Bug List, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 2.18
People
(Reporter: raphael.bossek, Assigned: Wurblzap)
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
1.62 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
1.21 KB,
patch
|
kiko
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 1. Multiple RESOLVED/*-only bugs While changing several RESOLVED/*-only bugs at once you get *only* this offer to change the resolution/status: ( ) Accept bugs ( ) Reopen bugs ( ) Mark bugs as VERIFIED This is not the same as edit a single bug. While edit a single RESOLVED/* bug you have following options to change the resolution/status of this bug: ( ) Reopen bug ( ) Mark bug as VERIFIED ( ) Mark bug as CLOSED This should be the same for changing several bugs at once. You need also the possibility to change several RESOLVED/* bugs to CLOSED/* bugs. Rule 1: If only RESOLVED/* or VERIFIED/* bugs appear you have the possibility to change their resolution to CLOSED without changing the status. Rule 2a: It is not possible to "Accept bugs" while changing several bugs at once and at least one is RESOLVED/*. 2. Multiple VERIFIED/*-only bugs While changing serveral VERIFIED/*-only bugs at once you get *only* this offer to change the resolution/status: ( ) Accept bugs ( ) Reopen bugs ( ) Mark bugs as CLOSED If a single VERIFIED/* bug is edited *only* following options are offered to change the resolution/status: ( ) Reopen bug ( ) Mark bug as CLOSED Rule 2b: It is not possible to "Accept bugs" while changing several bugs at once and at least one is VERIFIED/*. 3. Multiple CLOSED/*-only bugs While changing serveral CLOSED/*-only bugs at once you get *only* this offer to change the resolution/status: ( ) Accept bugs ( ) Reopen bugs If a single CLOSED/* bug is edited *only* following options are offered to change the resolution/status: ( ) Reopen bug Rule 2c: It is not possible to "Accept bugs" while changing several bugs at once and at least one is CLOSED/*. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Query where only resolution is set to RESOLVED or VERIFIED or CLOSED 2. Click on "Change several bugs at once" 3. Compare the option fields with the option filds with one of the displeyed bugs 4. See the inconsistency mentioned.
Reporter | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Version: unspecified → 2.16.2
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•22 years ago
|
||
This patch fixes the mentioned inconsistencies with the resolution/state while changing multiple bugs at once. The one and only affected file is template/en/default/list/edit-multiple.html.tmpl
Reporter | ||
Updated•22 years ago
|
Attachment #111558 -
Attachment description: Fixes the inconstencies with resolution/state → Fixes the inconstencies with resolution/status
Comment 2•21 years ago
|
||
Behavior 1 ---------- I can confirm behavior 1 on today's cvs-tip of 2.17.6. However, you CAN set VERIFED bugs to CLOSED. Still, the behavior should be consistent between the two templates. In addition, now you can re-assign RESOLVED bugs in the mass-change, but you can't re-assign them individually. Behavior 2 ---------- You can "Accept" a VERIFIED bug, but nothing happens. (That is, email is sent, but there is no status change.) "Accept" should be removed from mass-change GUI. Behavior 3 ---------- Same as #2 This seems like a simple fix. The patch attached looks good on a quick glance, but may have bit-rotted. -M
Severity: major → minor
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
OS: Windows XP → All
Version: 2.16.2 → 2.17.6
Updated•21 years ago
|
Assignee: endico → nobody
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
Closing resolved bugs WORKSFORME since bug 239826, so restricting Accept is all what needs to be done.
Assignee | ||
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #158087 -
Flags: review?
Updated•20 years ago
|
Attachment #158087 -
Flags: review?(kiko)
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 158087 [details] [diff] [review] Allowing Accept only if all bugs are open Tested, looks good.
Attachment #158087 -
Flags: review?(kiko)
Attachment #158087 -
Flags: review?
Attachment #158087 -
Flags: review+
Updated•20 years ago
|
Flags: approval?
Flags: approval2.18?
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #2) > In addition, now you can re-assign RESOLVED bugs in the mass-change, but you > can't re-assign them individually. Can someone please file an additional bug to investigate whether this is intentional or not? I'm not sure it's not actually a good thing to allow this everywhere -- having to reopen a bug and then reassign seems a bit obnoxious.
Assignee: nobody → wurblzap
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #2) > > In addition, now you can re-assign RESOLVED bugs in the mass-change, but you > > can't re-assign them individually. > > Can someone please file an additional bug to investigate whether this is > intentional or not? I'm not sure it's not actually a good thing to allow this > everywhere -- having to reopen a bug and then reassign seems a bit obnoxious. It was intentional on mass-change. We needed it when moving bugs out of Webtools into Bugzilla during the product move. I think it only still doesn't work on show_bug for historical reasons. I don't know any reason why it shouldn't.
Flags: approval?
Flags: approval2.18?
Flags: approval2.18+
Flags: approval+
Hardware: PC → All
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.18
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
Checking in template/en/default/list/edit-multiple.html.tmpl; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/default/list/edit-multiple.html.tmpl,v <-- edit-multiple.html.tmpl new revision: 1.20; previous revision: 1.19 done Checking in template/en/default/list/edit-multiple.html.tmpl; /cvsroot/mozilla/webtools/bugzilla/template/en/default/list/edit-multiple.html.tmpl,v <-- edit-multiple.html.tmpl new revision: 1.17.2.2; previous revision: 1.17.2.1 done
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 8•20 years ago
|
||
Forgot to mention in the cvs log the author (patch was made by Marc Schumann <wurblzap@gmail.com>).
Updated•12 years ago
|
QA Contact: matty_is_a_geek → default-qa
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•