Returned value of "unhandledPromptBehavior" for "session.new" has an invalid value "dismiss and notify" when unspecified
Categories
(Remote Protocol :: WebDriver BiDi, defect, P2)
Tracking
(firefox131 fixed)
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox131 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: dariokondratiuk, Assigned: Sasha)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Whiteboard: [webdriver:m12][webdriver:relnote])
Attachments
(2 files)
Steps to reproduce:
Called the session.new with the arguments
{"id":1,"method":"session.new","params":{"capabilities":{"alwaysMatch":{"acceptInsecureCerts":false,"webSocketUrl":true}}}}
Actual results:
I got the response
{"type":"success","id":1,"result":{"sessionId":"4baa79eb-cbfc-4eec-8a8b-3a0b8561268a","capabilities":{"acceptInsecureCerts":false,"browserName":"firefox","browserVersion":"130.0a1","platformName":"mac","unhandledPromptBehavior":"dismiss and notify","userAgent":"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:130.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/130.0","moz:buildID":"20240722092846","moz:headless":false,"moz:platformVersion":"23.5.0","moz:processID":33451,"moz:profile":"/var/folders/_d/6zl2pzmn1cd0y9h9rdx6zwcc0000gn/T/qcmjvky2.bg4","moz:shutdownTimeout":60000,"proxy":{}}}
Expected results:
According to the docs https://w3c.github.io/webdriver-bidi/#type-session-UserPromptHandler, "dismiss and notify" is not a valid value
Comment 1•3 months ago
|
||
The Bugbug bot thinks this bug should belong to the 'Firefox::Session Restore' component, and is moving the bug to that component. Please correct in case you think the bot is wrong.
Comment 2•2 months ago
|
||
I don't think this belongs here, moving it. Bad bot.
Comment 3•2 months ago
|
||
Thanks for the report! As it looks like this is a problem with the WebDriver BiDi specification especially when serializing the user prompt handler:
https://w3c.github.io/webdriver/#dfn-serialize-the-user-prompt-handler
When the capability hasn't been specified when requesting a new session we don't have any entry and the map is null
, and in the serialization steps we just return dismiss and notify
as first step. Most likely we should make that dependent on the BiDi
flag to make it conforming to the CDDL.
Updated•2 months ago
|
Comment 4•2 months ago
|
||
Using an empty object as value for session.new
we return that as well. Given that the capability is optional in the returned capabilities we might actually not include it at all?
Comment 5•2 months ago
|
||
In the scope of this bug, let's just stop returning the capability if it's not provided by the client.
We can file a follow up to handle the edge cases that still exist in the spec.
Assignee | ||
Updated•2 months ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•2 months ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•2 months ago
|
||
Comment 9•2 months ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/228cec8e3476
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/d3fca12d84b3
Description
•