Closed
Bug 1919856
Opened 2 years ago
Closed 1 year ago
Can we pack JitScript better?
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript Engine: JIT, task, P5)
Core
JavaScript Engine: JIT
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
136 Branch
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox136 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: mgaudet, Assigned: leftmostcat)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Keywords: good-first-bug)
Attachments
(1 external file)
Looking at this structure layout report for JitScript I'm left feeling like surely we can do better than this (12 hole bytes). I did try briefly, but didn't succeed :D
Updated•2 years ago
|
Keywords: good-first-bug
| Assignee | ||
Updated•1 year ago
|
Assignee: nobody → leftmostcat
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•1 year ago
|
||
Pushed by sean@thunderbird.net:
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/2bb0d9ae2b8a
Reorder JitScript field for improved packing. r=mgaudet
Comment 3•1 year ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 1 year ago
status-firefox136:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → 136 Branch
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•