display marionette tasks in treeherder Mn() groups instead of ungrouped
Categories
(Testing :: Marionette Client and Harness, task, P3)
Tracking
(firefox133 fixed)
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox133 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: jmaher, Assigned: jmaher)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [webdriver:m13][webdriver:external])
Attachments
(1 file)
as per https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1921411#c10, we want to put Marionette tasks into groups!
Comment 1•1 year ago
|
||
Thanks for filing Joel. Let me just repeat my comment from the other bug:
What if we do it similar to Mochitests and just use numbers for integration tests? That would result in Mn(1, 2, unit1, unit2). Also would it be possible to have the swr jobs in their own group like Mn-swr(1, 2, unit1, unit2)?
We can discuss in our triage session on Monday what a preferred naming schema could be.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•1 year ago
|
||
Comment 3•1 year ago
|
||
We agreed on that this looks fine to us. Joel, if you have the time you could go ahead with the patch. Thanks!
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•1 year ago
|
||
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 6•1 year ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
Comment 7•1 year ago
|
||
Hi Joel, is it actually expected that when searching on Treeherder for Mn we no longer get all the Marionette jobs shown? No job gets found since this change was made. As an example see this changeset with the Mn filter. But when I search for Marionette the jobs are visible.
Updated•1 year ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•1 year ago
|
||
yes, we don't match on group name, but instead task label or treeherder code.
Updated•1 year ago
|
Description
•