Open
Bug 1925744
Opened 1 year ago
Updated 1 year ago
Audit memory-position based uses of RedBlackTree
Categories
(Core :: Memory Allocator, task)
Core
Memory Allocator
Tracking
()
NEW
People
(Reporter: jstutte, Unassigned)
References
Details
Working on bug 1924444 showed that the current usage of memory position based comparators for RedBlackTrees might not always yield the best result, and together with that that the size of those trees might matter, too, as operations on them are O(log(n)) and can touch quite a lot of objects.
An example of this is mRunsAvail where we are mixing a size based comparator with a position based one, and also chunk comparators use similar conditions.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•