Connections to port 4160 are erroneously blocked by the "bad port list" (should be 4190)
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Networking, defect, P2)
Tracking
()
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox-esr115 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox-esr128 | --- | fixed |
| firefox132 | --- | wontfix |
| firefox133 | --- | fixed |
| firefox134 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: pawel.slowik, Assigned: jesup)
References
(Regression)
Details
(Keywords: regression, Whiteboard: [necko-triaged][necko-priority-new])
Attachments
(1 file)
|
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
dmeehan
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
dmeehan
:
approval-mozilla-esr128+
|
Details | Review |
Actual results:
The patch from bug https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1889059 adds port 4160 to the gBadPortList array. This is wrong, the port number should be 4190, as mentioned in the title of the aforementioned bug report.
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 1•1 year ago
|
||
:jesup, since you are the author of the regressor, bug 1889059, could you take a look? Also, could you set the severity field?
For more information, please visit BugBot documentation.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•1 year ago
|
||
Updated•1 year ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Updated•1 year ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 3•1 year ago
|
||
Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1889059
| Assignee | ||
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 5•1 year ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
Comment 6•1 year ago
|
||
The patch landed in nightly and beta is affected.
:jesup, is this bug important enough to require an uplift?
- If yes, please nominate the patch for beta approval.
- If no, please set
status-firefox133towontfix.
For more information, please visit BugBot documentation.
Updated•1 year ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•1 year ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9435277 [details]
Bug 1927546: Fix sieve port number r=#necko-reviewers!
Beta/Release Uplift Approval Request
- User impact if declined/Reason for urgency: super-low-risk fix to recent checkin
- Is this code covered by automated tests?: Yes
- Has the fix been verified in Nightly?: Yes
- Needs manual test from QE?: No
- If yes, steps to reproduce:
- List of other uplifts needed: None
- Risk to taking this patch: Low
- Why is the change risky/not risky? (and alternatives if risky): About as low a risk as is possible
- String changes made/needed: none
- Is Android affected?: Yes
Comment 8•1 year ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9435277 [details]
Bug 1927546: Fix sieve port number r=#necko-reviewers!
Approved for 133.0b9
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 10•1 year ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9435277 [details]
Bug 1927546: Fix sieve port number r=#necko-reviewers!
Approved for 128.5esr.
Comment 11•1 year ago
|
||
| uplift | ||
Updated•1 year ago
|
Description
•