Closed Bug 1933835 Opened 1 year ago Closed 1 year ago

firefox : Depends: libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 (>= 2.22.0) but it is not installable

Categories

(Release Engineering :: Release Automation, defect)

defect

Tracking

(firefox-esr115 unaffected, firefox-esr128134+ fixed, firefox133+ fixed, firefox134+ fixed, firefox135+ fixed)

RESOLVED FIXED
Tracking Status
firefox-esr115 --- unaffected
firefox-esr128 134+ fixed
firefox133 + fixed
firefox134 + fixed
firefox135 + fixed

People

(Reporter: glandium, Assigned: glandium)

Details

Attachments

(4 files)

The .deb is not installable on Debian testing/sid anymore, as of this change: https://tracker.debian.org/news/1586983/accepted-gdk-pixbuf-xlib-2402-4-source-into-unstable/ that removed the libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 package. We'd probably need to depend on both libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 and libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 (the latter being "only" 4 years old).

Assignee: nobody → mh+mozilla

I suppose we'll want to uplift this on all branches. Any idea how we can fix 128.5.0esr and 133.0?

Flags: needinfo?(jlorenzo)
Flags: needinfo?(jcristau)

Or maybe we don't care for the next 3.5 weeks (or less if we have dot releases), since this is "only" affecting Debian testing/unstable?

Pushed by mh@glandium.org: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/bdccbc5387bf Allow to install deb package on systems with libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 instead of libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0. r=jcristau

[Tracking Requested - why for this release]: uninstallable package on development debian versions

It's going to be a bit longer for the ESR due to the holidays, but that might be good enough yeah. 133 has a planned dot release on the 10th, let's get this on the release management radar.

Flags: needinfo?(jlorenzo)
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 1 year ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Attachment #9440670 - Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #9440671 - Flags: approval-mozilla-release?
Attachment #9440672 - Flags: approval-mozilla-esr128?

beta Uplift Approval Request

  • User impact if declined: Impossibility to install the .deb packages on Debian trixie/testing/unstable
  • Code covered by automated testing: no
  • Fix verified in Nightly: yes
  • Needs manual QE test: no
  • Steps to reproduce for manual QE testing: N/A
  • Risk associated with taking this patch: Low
  • Explanation of risk level: It only alters the environment where .deb repackaging happens
  • String changes made/needed: N/A
  • Is Android affected?: no

release Uplift Approval Request

  • User impact if declined: Impossibility to install the .deb packages on Debian trixie/testing/unstable
  • Code covered by automated testing: no
  • Fix verified in Nightly: yes
  • Needs manual QE test: no
  • Steps to reproduce for manual QE testing: N/A
  • Risk associated with taking this patch: Low
  • Explanation of risk level: It only alters the environment where .deb repackaging happens
  • String changes made/needed: N/A
  • Is Android affected?: no

esr128 Uplift Approval Request

  • User impact if declined: Impossibility to install the .deb packages on Debian trixie/testing/unstable
  • Code covered by automated testing: no
  • Fix verified in Nightly: yes
  • Needs manual QE test: no
  • Steps to reproduce for manual QE testing: N/A
  • Risk associated with taking this patch: Low
  • Explanation of risk level: It only alters the environment where .deb repackaging happens
  • String changes made/needed: N/A
  • Is Android affected?: no
Attachment #9440670 - Flags: approval-mozilla-beta? → approval-mozilla-beta+
Attachment #9440672 - Flags: approval-mozilla-esr128? → approval-mozilla-esr128+
Component: Release Automation: Packaging → Release Automation
Attachment #9440671 - Flags: approval-mozilla-release? → approval-mozilla-release+
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: