firefox : Depends: libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 (>= 2.22.0) but it is not installable
Categories
(Release Engineering :: Release Automation, defect)
Tracking
(firefox-esr115 unaffected, firefox-esr128134+ fixed, firefox133+ fixed, firefox134+ fixed, firefox135+ fixed)
People
(Reporter: glandium, Assigned: glandium)
Details
Attachments
(4 files)
|
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
Details | Review | |
|
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
phab-bot
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Review |
|
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
phab-bot
:
approval-mozilla-release+
|
Details | Review |
|
48 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
phab-bot
:
approval-mozilla-esr128+
|
Details | Review |
The .deb is not installable on Debian testing/sid anymore, as of this change: https://tracker.debian.org/news/1586983/accepted-gdk-pixbuf-xlib-2402-4-source-into-unstable/ that removed the libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 package. We'd probably need to depend on both libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 and libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0 (the latter being "only" 4 years old).
| Assignee | ||
Updated•1 year ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•1 year ago
|
||
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•1 year ago
|
||
I suppose we'll want to uplift this on all branches. Any idea how we can fix 128.5.0esr and 133.0?
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•1 year ago
|
||
Or maybe we don't care for the next 3.5 weeks (or less if we have dot releases), since this is "only" affecting Debian testing/unstable?
Comment 5•1 year ago
|
||
[Tracking Requested - why for this release]: uninstallable package on development debian versions
It's going to be a bit longer for the ESR due to the holidays, but that might be good enough yeah. 133 has a planned dot release on the 10th, let's get this on the release management radar.
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 7•1 year ago
|
||
Original Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D230470
Updated•1 year ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 8•1 year ago
|
||
Original Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D230470
Updated•1 year ago
|
| Assignee | ||
Comment 9•1 year ago
|
||
Original Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D230470
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 10•1 year ago
|
||
beta Uplift Approval Request
- User impact if declined: Impossibility to install the .deb packages on Debian trixie/testing/unstable
- Code covered by automated testing: no
- Fix verified in Nightly: yes
- Needs manual QE test: no
- Steps to reproduce for manual QE testing: N/A
- Risk associated with taking this patch: Low
- Explanation of risk level: It only alters the environment where .deb repackaging happens
- String changes made/needed: N/A
- Is Android affected?: no
Comment 11•1 year ago
|
||
release Uplift Approval Request
- User impact if declined: Impossibility to install the .deb packages on Debian trixie/testing/unstable
- Code covered by automated testing: no
- Fix verified in Nightly: yes
- Needs manual QE test: no
- Steps to reproduce for manual QE testing: N/A
- Risk associated with taking this patch: Low
- Explanation of risk level: It only alters the environment where .deb repackaging happens
- String changes made/needed: N/A
- Is Android affected?: no
Comment 12•1 year ago
|
||
esr128 Uplift Approval Request
- User impact if declined: Impossibility to install the .deb packages on Debian trixie/testing/unstable
- Code covered by automated testing: no
- Fix verified in Nightly: yes
- Needs manual QE test: no
- Steps to reproduce for manual QE testing: N/A
- Risk associated with taking this patch: Low
- Explanation of risk level: It only alters the environment where .deb repackaging happens
- String changes made/needed: N/A
- Is Android affected?: no
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 13•1 year ago
|
||
| uplift | ||
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 14•1 year ago
|
||
| uplift | ||
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 15•1 year ago
|
||
| uplift | ||
Updated•1 year ago
|
Description
•