3.58 - 3.47% pdfpaint issue8078.pdf / pdfpaint issue8078.pdf (Windows) regression on Tue December 3 2024
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript: GC, defect, P4)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox-esr128 | --- | unaffected |
firefox133 | --- | unaffected |
firefox134 | --- | unaffected |
firefox135 | --- | fix-optional |
People
(Reporter: intermittent-bug-filer, Unassigned, NeedInfo)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug, Regression)
Details
(4 keywords)
Perfherder has detected a talos performance regression from push 1a8b6c677e25084ce731e47a40b775f39ab75275. As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression.
Regressions:
Ratio | Test | Platform | Options | Absolute values (old vs new) |
---|---|---|---|---|
4% | pdfpaint issue8078.pdf | windows11-64-shippable-qr | e10s fission stylo webrender-sw | 2,090.22 -> 2,165.02 |
3% | pdfpaint issue8078.pdf | windows11-64-shippable-qr | e10s fission stylo webrender-sw | 2,098.32 -> 2,171.18 |
Details of the alert can be found in the alert summary, including links to graphs and comparisons for each of the affected tests. Please follow our guide to handling regression bugs and let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the patch(es) may be backed out in accordance with our regression policy.
If you need the profiling jobs you can trigger them yourself from treeherder job view or ask a sheriff to do that for you.
You can run all of these tests on try with ./mach try perf --alert 43002
The following documentation link provides more information about this command.
For more information on performance sheriffing please see our FAQ.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to reach out to aglavic@mozilla.com.
Comment 1•2 months ago
|
||
Set release status flags based on info from the regressing bug 1932751
Comment 2•2 months ago
|
||
Here are the corresponding graphs for Linux and Mac (1015 and 1470) : https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perfherder/graphs?highlightAlerts=1&highlightChangelogData=1&highlightCommonAlerts=0&replicates=0&series=autoland,5094157,1,1&series=autoland,5094655,1,1&series=autoland,5098036,1,1&series=autoland,5098335,1,1&series=autoland,299655,1,1&series=autoland,301200,1,1&timerange=2592000&zoom=1730943090938,1733550291472,2823.1755555555565,8123.584444444444
Out of these 6, only the Mac1015 shows some regression around the time the regressor landed. But the graph then starts improving.
Comment 3•2 months ago
|
||
I think we should take this regression.
It might be worth checking whether there is extra time spent tracing store buffers in nursery collection for this benchmark, to see if the change is actually related to this push. If so it might be worth making us coalescing entries in the slots edge store buffer more eagerly but I think it's unlikely to be much of a win.
Updated•2 months ago
|
Updated•2 months ago
|
Comment 4•2 months ago
|
||
Resolving as WONTFIX due to comment 3, and that we've increased the alerting threshold to 6%.
Description
•