some font rendering broken after font update
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Text and Fonts, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: sasc, Unassigned)
References
(Regression)
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(1 file)
117.44 KB,
image/png
|
Details |
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:133.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/133.0
Steps to reproduce:
OS: Endeavour (arch based)
Today there was an update for the tft-opensans package. After installing, font rendering changed and is actually inconsistent with the developer edition's rendition of some text.
For example, go to https://demo.freshrss.org/ and observe that almost all text is displayed in italic font. Open the same page with the latest developer edition and observe the difference. Also see the attached screenshot.
I was not quite sure, wether this is an issue with packaging, with the font itself, the webpage or with Firefox - but given that FF134 as well as Chrome do not see any changes after the update, I thought this might be the place to report.
Actual results:
Fonts render in italic which did not so before
Expected results:
Fonts should not be rendered in italic (developer edition behaviour). Also Chrom(ium) renders these fonts non-italic.
Comment 1•2 months ago
|
||
The Bugbug bot thinks this bug should belong to the 'Core::Graphics: Text' component, and is moving the bug to that component. Please correct in case you think the bot is wrong.
Comment 2•2 months ago
|
||
Jonathan, is this some type of font selection issue?
Comment 3•2 months ago
|
||
Could you run mozregression to figure out what caused the 133 to 134 behavior change?
$ mozregression --bad 133 --good 134 --find-fix -a <your-url>
should work.
Assuming this is somewhat configuration specific so triaging as S3 (I also use Arch and I don't see this on 133).
(In reply to Emilio Cobos Álvarez (:emilio) from comment #3)
Could you run mozregression to figure out what caused the 133 to 134 behavior change?
$ mozregression --bad 133 --good 134 --find-fix -a <your-url>
should work.
Assuming this is somewhat configuration specific so triaging as S3 (I also use Arch and I don't see this on 133).
Done. :)
First good revision: 030412276e15ccc3c1893524e87b3b1b822e91fa
Last bad revision: cbd6a4e86db48aef29684602041908cb2debef2f
Updated•2 months ago
|
Comment 5•2 months ago
|
||
It's not a regression but a fix. I think given that fix it's likely that the font includes some broken metadata like the one discussed in that bug.
News - now the latest developer version also shows the reported behaviour, same as 134.0.1.
I reran mozregression --bad 134 --good 132 -a https://demo.freshrss.org
and that resulted in
(In reply to sasc from comment #6)
News - now the latest developer version also shows the reported behaviour, same as 134.0.1.
I reran mozregression --bad 134 --good 132 -a https://demo.freshrss.org
and that resulted in
Last good revision: cbd6a4e86db48aef29684602041908cb2debef2f
First bad revision: 030412276e15ccc3c1893524e87b3b1b822e91fa
Pushlog
which somehow complete contradicts my earlier mozregression-run.
Anyway - the issue persists, is not present in 134 and 135, too and it seems like https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1941820 is related. I do not see the issue which is reported there, though. Presumably because of different fonts.
Sorry for the messy report - seems like I cannot edit my comment directly above.
Updated•17 days ago
|
Updated•17 days ago
|
Description
•