Closed
Bug 193814
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
on windows, use SetFileAttributes instead of chmod
Categories
(Core :: XPCOM, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: dougt, Assigned: dougt)
References
()
Details
Reading the some postings regarding chmod() vs. _chmod() vs.
G|SetFileAttributes, I think that we should be using the later.
more info needed.
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
Would SetFileAttribute be any better? The nsIFile chooses to use the Unix style
chmod flags as its model. The Windows version of chmod only works for owner, and
doesn't work for user or group. I think you could implement the user flags, but
not sure about the group. I don't think SetFileAttribute is going to add
anything that would help this implementation. Actaully I think it supports less
than what chmod supports currently.
Working with the security API in Windows is always fun. Implementing the user
and possibly the group isn't going to be trivial.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
what David Bradley said:
Window's version of chmod, which is how this is implemented, only supports the
owner flags, 0400, 0200, and 0100. If you're trying to use any of the other
flags it's probably going to ignore them.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•